Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
crackocain
Service Provider
Posts: 241
Liked: 27 times
Joined: Dec 14, 2015 8:20 pm
Full Name: Mehmet Istanbullu
Location: Türkiye
Contact:

Veeam Best Practise - Management Domain

Post by crackocain »

Hello

I saw this section tonight. https://vbr.veeambp.com/VBP/Security/Se ... mains.html

Veeam mentioned two forest trust and one active directory schema.
production.local
mngt.local

But i always use two different active directory schema and not make trust relationship. Yes it will management overhead.
Primary and Additional DC: customer.local - IP subnet 172.16.0.0
Primary and Additional DC: customer.mgmt- IP subnet 10.10.10.0

customer.local is use for clients and servers (sql, file server, rdp etc)
customer.mgmt is use for vmware, veeam, backup devices or etc
All users (include IT staff) in the customer.local domain. I add customer.mgmt dc address to in the customer.local conditional forwarders. So dns resolution is works.

Is there anything I missed about this design? Pros and cons?
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14320
Liked: 2890 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Veeam Best Practise - Management Domain

Post by HannesK »

Hello,
I don't see anything missing in your design. You already described the con with more management overhead. From a Veeam backup perspective I don't see any overhead. Maybe for other services.

Best regards,
Hannes
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], twirtley and 179 guests