- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 252
- Liked: 26 times
- Joined: Apr 05, 2011 11:44 pm
On our file server - Win2012 with dedupe, we got terabytes of data and using dedupe to achieve some space savings. On 10TB volume (5x2TB VMDKs mounted in windows) we have 3.9TB of used space after deduplication with 34% dedupe ratio and 2TB dedupe "savings". So in my understanding we are actually storing about 5.9TB raw equivalent without this nifty feature.
Our Veeam jobs show that we actually process 4.9TB of data. Why the mismatch? I assume 4.9TB is what VMware VMDKs actually contain (not empty space)? Or is it just the blocks that have ever been touched by windows, even if they now contain no data (for example files were deleted or reduced in size after deduplication had processed them)?
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 5334
- Liked: 2179 times
- Joined: Jun 05, 2009 12:57 pm
- Full Name: Tom Sightler
This. Veeam does not know anything about the underlying filesystem, only about the disk and what blocks have been "used". That's the nature of an image based backup. Deleting files does not delete data from the disk blocks, the blocks are simply marked as free so that they can be reused. If you create a new, completely empty VMDK, write a 100GB file to it, and then delete it, Veeam will still backup 100GB of data.Yuki wrote:Or is it just the blocks that have ever been touched by windows, even if they now contain no data (for example files were deleted or reduced in size after deduplication had processed them)?
Windows dedupe actually dirties more blocks than non-dedupe on a "per-file" basis since each new file (or changed file) is originally written non-deduped. Then the Windows dedupe process reads the files, and splits them into the "common" portion (potentially adding new segments to the dedupe pool) and the "unique" portion of the file and frees the original blocks, but these blocks are still "dirty" from the Veeam perspective since VMware will report them as changed and they will still contain new data.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 18 guests