-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14536
- Liked: 1603 times
- Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
- Full Name: Dmitry Popov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Offsite Backup Copy jobs in Ver 12
Glad to hear! Thank you for the feedback Andi Kola!
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 1
- Liked: never
- Joined: Feb 13, 2024 7:17 am
- Contact:
Re: Offsite Backup Copy jobs in Ver 12
Thank you for brining this function back.
What is with Veeam Agent Backups?
They are still not working for Backup copy as Copy jobs sources.
What is with Veeam Agent Backups?
They are still not working for Backup copy as Copy jobs sources.
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 70
- Liked: 10 times
- Joined: Jul 27, 2016 1:39 am
- Full Name: Steve Hughes
- Contact:
Re: Offsite Backup Copy jobs in Ver 12
I've been running all our client sites on Ver 11 due to the removal of BCJ->BCJ functionality in Ver 12. I was very excited to see the new BCJ->BCJ functionality, until I upgraded a site to Ver 12.1.2.172 and found that the new BCJ->BCJ functionality doesn't support using CloudConnect as the destination. This is a scenario that we use heavily (per my original post). Just as well I tried this on one small set of BCJ jobs before converting all BCJ jobs to the new format. Is there a plan to ever address this?
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14536
- Liked: 1603 times
- Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
- Full Name: Dmitry Popov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Offsite Backup Copy jobs in Ver 12
Hello Steve,
This limitation is temporary and will be removed in one of the upcoming releases. Thank you for your post!
This limitation is temporary and will be removed in one of the upcoming releases. Thank you for your post!
-
- Novice
- Posts: 6
- Liked: 3 times
- Joined: Nov 08, 2017 12:12 pm
- Full Name: Peter Frentin
- Contact:
Re: Offsite Backup Copy jobs in Ver 12
Any update on the roadmap for this?
"Repository with rotated drives is not supported when Backup Copy job is used as a source"
Regards,
Peter
"Repository with rotated drives is not supported when Backup Copy job is used as a source"
Regards,
Peter
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 10
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: Jan 22, 2011 1:34 am
- Full Name: Michael Gregory
- Contact:
Re: Offsite Backup Copy jobs in Ver 12
^^^ Yeah we're still needing this function back... We've scripted copying the files manually but if the backup copies get modified at the same time we're running the script it fails. This is causing us problems. It would be nice to know when the next update with this functionality will be coming.
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14536
- Liked: 1603 times
- Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
- Full Name: Dmitry Popov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Offsite Backup Copy jobs in Ver 12
Hello guys,
Thank you this limitation is on our radar too. Mind me asking what is going to be used as a target for such backup copy job?
Thank you this limitation is on our radar too. Mind me asking what is going to be used as a target for such backup copy job?
-
- Novice
- Posts: 6
- Liked: 3 times
- Joined: Nov 08, 2017 12:12 pm
- Full Name: Peter Frentin
- Contact:
Re: Offsite Backup Copy jobs in Ver 12
Targets are USB connected hard disks in our case.
Regards,
Peter
Regards,
Peter
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14536
- Liked: 1603 times
- Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
- Full Name: Dmitry Popov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Offsite Backup Copy jobs in Ver 12
Understood. Thank you Peter!
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 1
- Liked: never
- Joined: Jun 14, 2024 2:00 pm
- Full Name: trofie
- Contact:
Re: Offsite Backup Copy jobs in Ver 12
It seems a bit rich to me that you force everyone to update to v12 as you end product support of v11, but at the same time, you haven't put all the required features people are using in the old version into the new version yet.
To add salt to the wound, this particular thread is over a year old, cmon team.
To add salt to the wound, this particular thread is over a year old, cmon team.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31695
- Liked: 6887 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 62 guests