foggy wrote:However, you could avoid the merge process by enabling backup copy active fulls. This will effectively switch it to a simple forward incremental mode with sequential writes on the target storage.
cividan wrote:Question #1: Can we specify different retention setting for backup job and backup copy job?
cividan wrote:Question #2: Can we tell the "backup copy job" to always copy the latest full from the "main backup storage" and never do incremental so that it doesn't have to deal with merge and random IO?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests