Hi,
We are in the process of testing Cloud Connect with our customers that are running their own VBR server for their VMware environment.
Most of our customers have a standalone ESXi host running 2-5 VMs for the most part, they have the cheapest license for both VMware and Veeam, and the WAN links are usually slow, 2-20Mbits. WAN Accelerator is probably impossible to get the customer to buy unless there's some sort of rental feature...
Today, we are copying backups to USB connected HDDs which is swapped physically by a consultant, and brought back to our HQ for storing.
So, my question is:
1. In our scenario, is there any other benefits of Cloud Connect than the fact its secure, simple to set up and manage?
2. Would there be a better performance/shorter backup copy interval if we used a simple Remote Backup Repository, with a remote proxy and remote Repository? (Im thinking of the processing being done in the remote/target location)
We have tried Backup Copy Jobs to a Remote Repository by adding a repository over WAN, in version 6.5 and 7, but the time to complete took forever, so we canceled it and went back to swapping the drives again..
All answers, tips and suggestions are appreciated.
Best Regards,
Ruben Gilja
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 42
- Liked: 5 times
- Joined: Sep 24, 2012 11:11 am
- Full Name: Ruben Gilja
- Contact:
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 7328
- Liked: 781 times
- Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
- Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Cloud Connect vs Remote Repository
Hi Ruben,
1. The main benefits are those you`ve named. Remote repository vs. CC is also usually CAPEX vs. OPEX.
2. Proxy is not a part of data flow in case of backup copy.
Thanks!
1. The main benefits are those you`ve named. Remote repository vs. CC is also usually CAPEX vs. OPEX.
2. Proxy is not a part of data flow in case of backup copy.
Have you implemented Seeding for backup copy jobs?rubeng wrote:We have tried Backup Copy Jobs to a Remote Repository by adding a repository over WAN, in version 6.5 and 7, but the time to complete took forever, so we canceled it and went back to swapping the drives again..
Thanks!
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 42
- Liked: 5 times
- Joined: Sep 24, 2012 11:11 am
- Full Name: Ruben Gilja
- Contact:
Re: Cloud Connect vs Remote Repository
Thank you for getting back to me.
We know about the seeding option, yes. I was just wondering if there were anything I might have missed, that could benefit us.
We know about the seeding option, yes. I was just wondering if there were anything I might have missed, that could benefit us.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 7328
- Liked: 781 times
- Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
- Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Cloud Connect vs Remote Repository
A general technique to speed up backup copy job is the mentioned WAN acceleration.
Poor performance investigation is usually started from the bottleneck statistics. If you provide it we can think how to improve the performance.
Thanks!
Poor performance investigation is usually started from the bottleneck statistics. If you provide it we can think how to improve the performance.
Thanks!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests