Direct SAN Restore Thick vs UNMAP Thin

VMware specific discussions

Direct SAN Restore Thick vs UNMAP Thin

Veeam Logoby regnak2012 » Fri May 26, 2017 3:06 pm

Hi,
Quick design decision:
I'm designing an iSCSI based VMware solution with a physical Veeam proxy server. I hope to do Direct SAN Backups (3PAR). I've got 2 x 10Gb iSCSI ports on the Proxy and 2 x 1Gb for management. So if I go Thick on the VM I'm good and can get Direct SAN Backup AND Restores.
But
I'd like to use the new vSphere 6.5 UNMAP feature which requires THIN VMs! This is required for in guest UNMAP. Dooh!

Am I missing anything or are these two features mutually exclusive?!
Thanks
regnak2012
Influencer
 
Posts: 24
Liked: 2 times
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 3:46 pm
Full Name: Michael

Re: Direct SAN Restore Thick vs UNMAP Thin

Veeam Logoby Andreas Neufert » Sat May 27, 2017 8:53 pm

DirectSAN Backup is pretty fast, but DirectSAN Restore (to thick disks) is pretty slow compared with the other restore methods by design of VMware (coordination with vCenter/Host in the background). I would suggest to add a HotAdd proxy just for restore.
Andreas Neufert
Veeam Software
 
Posts: 2289
Liked: 384 times
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 8:36 am
Location: Germany
Full Name: @AndyandtheVMs Veeam PM


Return to VMware vSphere



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest