Interesting speed difference

Discussions specific to VMware vSphere hypervisor

Interesting speed difference

Veeam Logoby readie » Fri May 22, 2015 9:48 am

I have two very similar backup jobs, each with 16 VMs, general purpose servers, using the same Veeam server and proxies and target. However, the stats are quite different . .
job 1 - Processed 1.6TB, Read 57GB, Transferred 22.7GB (2.5x), Duration 2:40:57, Processing rate 16MB/s, Bottleneck Target (22%, 4%, 51%, 54%)
job 2 - Processed 975GB, Read 170GB, Transferred 20.8GB (8.2x), Duration 1:08:35, Processing rate 54MB/s, Bottleneck Source (48%, 5%, 47%, 35%)

OK so the jobs are somewhat different, but job 2 reads over 3 times as much data, compresses at 8.2x rather than 2.5x, and Processing rate is over 3x as fast. Is the processing that much faster because the compression is much better for some reason?
What further diagnosis can I do to see why one is so much faster, or is it just down to the type of data on the VMs?
Bob Eadie
Computer Manager at Bedford School, UK (since 1999).
Veeam user since 2009.
Posts: 156
Liked: 30 times
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:29 am
Full Name: Bob Eadie

Re: Interesting speed difference

Veeam Logoby foggy » Fri May 22, 2015 11:53 am

readie wrote:is it just down to the type of data on the VMs?

To a large extent. Various processing rate for different VMs is expected, think amount of changed blocks, their compressibility, inline deduplication, etc. There're also a number of other factors.

Btw, make sure CBT is enabled for both jobs, so you're comparing apples to apples.
Veeam Software
Posts: 15592
Liked: 1161 times
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson

Return to VMware vSphere

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Anders, Bing [Bot], Google Feedfetcher and 1 guest