-
- Influencer
- Posts: 17
- Liked: never
- Joined: Aug 28, 2013 1:21 pm
- Full Name: Alex Beck
- Contact:
No reversed incrementals with Backup Copy Job
Hi
I wanted to use backup copy jobs for Veeam backups beeing copied to DR site. During testing I found that, although the original Job is configured with reversed incrementals (.vrb), the resulting backup copy is changed to forward incrementals (.vib). I could not find any Job Option where this could be changed. Is this behaviour by design or did I miss something?
AlexB
I wanted to use backup copy jobs for Veeam backups beeing copied to DR site. During testing I found that, although the original Job is configured with reversed incrementals (.vrb), the resulting backup copy is changed to forward incrementals (.vib). I could not find any Job Option where this could be changed. Is this behaviour by design or did I miss something?
AlexB
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 1531
- Liked: 226 times
- Joined: Jul 21, 2010 9:47 am
- Full Name: Chris Dearden
- Contact:
Re: No reversed incrementals with Backup Copy Job
Hi Alex,
its by design - the copy job will always produce a fwd incremental. When you hit your retention period , the last incremental will be rolled into the full , so its still an "incremental forever" process
its by design - the copy job will always produce a fwd incremental. When you hit your retention period , the last incremental will be rolled into the full , so its still an "incremental forever" process
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: No reversed incrementals with Backup Copy Job
Yep, backup copy job works with any backup mode as a source, synthetically building up a new restore point after reading incremental changes from the source repository. After initial synchronization, it is always incremental (full backup file (.vbk) is merged with the nearest incremental file (.vib) when retention applies).
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 17
- Liked: never
- Joined: Aug 28, 2013 1:21 pm
- Full Name: Alex Beck
- Contact:
Re: No reversed incrementals with Backup Copy Job
Thanks for clearing this up. Is there a reason for that? Wouldn't it be possible to have reversed incrementals, too?.
Another question: Is there a difference regarding reliability of a backup chain consisting of forward or reverse increments?
Another question: Is there a difference regarding reliability of a backup chain consisting of forward or reverse increments?
-
- VeeaMVP
- Posts: 6166
- Liked: 1971 times
- Joined: Jul 26, 2009 3:39 pm
- Full Name: Luca Dell'Oca
- Location: Varese, Italy
- Contact:
Re: No reversed incrementals with Backup Copy Job
Alex, since it's a forever incremental with synthetic creation of the VBK, there is almst no difference with a reversed incremental. They act the same way at the end, only forward incremental creates probably less I/O on the storage used for backup copy files.
About reliability, it's a forever incremental with synthetic creation of the full backup, just like reversed incremental. So I would say the reliability is the same.
Luca.
About reliability, it's a forever incremental with synthetic creation of the full backup, just like reversed incremental. So I would say the reliability is the same.
Luca.
Luca Dell'Oca
Principal EMEA Cloud Architect @ Veeam Software
@dellock6
https://www.virtualtothecore.com/
vExpert 2011 -> 2022
Veeam VMCE #1
Principal EMEA Cloud Architect @ Veeam Software
@dellock6
https://www.virtualtothecore.com/
vExpert 2011 -> 2022
Veeam VMCE #1
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31809
- Liked: 7301 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: No reversed incrementals with Backup Copy Job
It is naturally a better way of storing data when dealing with WAN, which are typically unreliable and slow. This way, failed or incomplete incremental run will not leave the latest restore point in the inconsistent state, as it would be the case with reversed incremental way of storing the restore points.AlexB wrote:Thanks for clearing this up. Is there a reason for that?
Plus, there are additional technical benefits of storing the data this way as it comes to WAN acceleration specifically.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 49 guests