Host-based backup of VMware vSphere VMs.
Post Reply
AlexB
Influencer
Posts: 17
Liked: never
Joined: Aug 28, 2013 1:21 pm
Full Name: Alex Beck
Contact:

No reversed incrementals with Backup Copy Job

Post by AlexB »

Hi

I wanted to use backup copy jobs for Veeam backups beeing copied to DR site. During testing I found that, although the original Job is configured with reversed incrementals (.vrb), the resulting backup copy is changed to forward incrementals (.vib). I could not find any Job Option where this could be changed. Is this behaviour by design or did I miss something?

AlexB
chrisdearden
Veteran
Posts: 1531
Liked: 226 times
Joined: Jul 21, 2010 9:47 am
Full Name: Chris Dearden
Contact:

Re: No reversed incrementals with Backup Copy Job

Post by chrisdearden »

Hi Alex,
its by design - the copy job will always produce a fwd incremental. When you hit your retention period , the last incremental will be rolled into the full , so its still an "incremental forever" process
foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 21139
Liked: 2141 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: No reversed incrementals with Backup Copy Job

Post by foggy »

Yep, backup copy job works with any backup mode as a source, synthetically building up a new restore point after reading incremental changes from the source repository. After initial synchronization, it is always incremental (full backup file (.vbk) is merged with the nearest incremental file (.vib) when retention applies).
AlexB
Influencer
Posts: 17
Liked: never
Joined: Aug 28, 2013 1:21 pm
Full Name: Alex Beck
Contact:

Re: No reversed incrementals with Backup Copy Job

Post by AlexB »

Thanks for clearing this up. Is there a reason for that? Wouldn't it be possible to have reversed incrementals, too?.

Another question: Is there a difference regarding reliability of a backup chain consisting of forward or reverse increments?
dellock6
VeeaMVP
Posts: 6166
Liked: 1971 times
Joined: Jul 26, 2009 3:39 pm
Full Name: Luca Dell'Oca
Location: Varese, Italy
Contact:

Re: No reversed incrementals with Backup Copy Job

Post by dellock6 » 2 people like this post

Alex, since it's a forever incremental with synthetic creation of the VBK, there is almst no difference with a reversed incremental. They act the same way at the end, only forward incremental creates probably less I/O on the storage used for backup copy files.

About reliability, it's a forever incremental with synthetic creation of the full backup, just like reversed incremental. So I would say the reliability is the same.

Luca.
Luca Dell'Oca
Principal EMEA Cloud Architect @ Veeam Software

@dellock6
https://www.virtualtothecore.com/
vExpert 2011 -> 2022
Veeam VMCE #1
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31809
Liked: 7301 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: No reversed incrementals with Backup Copy Job

Post by Gostev »

AlexB wrote:Thanks for clearing this up. Is there a reason for that?
It is naturally a better way of storing data when dealing with WAN, which are typically unreliable and slow. This way, failed or incomplete incremental run will not leave the latest restore point in the inconsistent state, as it would be the case with reversed incremental way of storing the restore points.

Plus, there are additional technical benefits of storing the data this way as it comes to WAN acceleration specifically.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 49 guests