Host-based backup of VMware vSphere VMs.
Post Reply
Moeff
Lurker
Posts: 1
Liked: never
Joined: Apr 23, 2018 2:51 pm
Contact:

Pre-seed a Backup job

Post by Moeff »

You can pre-seed a Backup Copy Job by remapping to a backup chain made by a Backup job.
But it doesn't work the other way around; you cannot select a backup chain made by a Backup Copy job as seed for a (new) Backup job.
So restore points are not fully interchangeable between job types.

Exporting a restore point into a new chain results in the same limitation regarding this.

I think I understand why Backup & Backup Copy chains are different if you keep forward/reverse incremental restore points in mind.
Also GFS restore points are part of the Backup Copy chain and therefore included in the same VBM file.
I imagine remapping to a regular Backup job could result in unwanted loss of (GFS) restore points when applying Backup retention policy.

But why should this be a limitation? Shouldn't restore points be portable - or at least when you export them?
Aren't the binary VBK/VIB files between Backup & Backup Copy jobs the same?

Let’s say for a given DR-scenario, I'd like to pre-seed a Backup job by reusing a forward incremental backup chain made by a Backup Copy job.
This in order to save bandwidth, because of slow links between multiple ROBOs and DR site. (we don't have local backup storage on each ROBO)

I made it work by;
- Deleting the original Backup Copy job and deleting the Backup Copy chain from "Disks (Imported)"
- Edit the VBM file and change JobType=0
- Rescan repo
- Remap Backup job.

I assume editing the VBM file is not officially supported by Veeam support, but it works...
Tested with per-VM & forward incremental backup chains - Veeam B&R 9.5 U3a & U4.

What are your thoughts on this?
foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 21139
Liked: 2141 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: Pre-seed a Backup job

Post by foggy »

Correct, editing VBM is not recommended. Moreover, capability to map regular backup jobs to backup chains produced by a backup copy job did exist in previous versions but was closed due to a number of support cases where backups were corrupted during transformation after being mapped this way, so I'd warn you from using it.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 23 guests