-
- Novice
- Posts: 5
- Liked: never
- Joined: Apr 10, 2014 7:19 pm
- Full Name: hoffman gonzalez
- Contact:
vSphere 5.5 Instant Recovery = Bad MBR?
A SureBackup job began failing recently and while investigating I've noticed that when I 'Instant Recover' my, for example, Exchange 2010 VM the OS begins to boot into Windows System Recovery console every time. Even using 'last known good config'/safe mode/etc it wont boot normally. at this point i stay in the windows system recovery console, open up a cmd prompt and issue 'bootrec /scanos' and the shell comes back saying it detected 0 installations of windows on all disks.
host is on esx 5.5.0(build 1331820) managed through vcenter5.5, veeam is on latest patch/update.
anyone come across a similar issue?
host is on esx 5.5.0(build 1331820) managed through vcenter5.5, veeam is on latest patch/update.
anyone come across a similar issue?
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 22
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Jan 25, 2013 5:05 pm
- Full Name: D W
- Contact:
[MERGED] : Backup and Restore of vmx-10 VM
Hi,
I have a backup of a Windows 2008 VM using VM Hardware version 10. The backup works fine.
File mode restores work fine...ie I can browse the VM and individually grab files.
If I do a full VM restore or Instant Recovery, the process completes and the VM boots however Windows either does not boot or I get a BSOD.
To test, I turned the VM off. I created a new job and did a full backup. I did Instant Recovery and once again, BSOD. If I boot the VM in question, it boots fine. If I clone it, it works fine.
Is there an issue with VM Hardware 10, that I have missed? Also, I just checked, I am running the latest VM Tools on ESX 5.5 latest Update. (Have not installed March and April updates yet). I'm using latest version of Veeam 7 with lated hotfix/patch.
Thanks
I have a backup of a Windows 2008 VM using VM Hardware version 10. The backup works fine.
File mode restores work fine...ie I can browse the VM and individually grab files.
If I do a full VM restore or Instant Recovery, the process completes and the VM boots however Windows either does not boot or I get a BSOD.
To test, I turned the VM off. I created a new job and did a full backup. I did Instant Recovery and once again, BSOD. If I boot the VM in question, it boots fine. If I clone it, it works fine.
Is there an issue with VM Hardware 10, that I have missed? Also, I just checked, I am running the latest VM Tools on ESX 5.5 latest Update. (Have not installed March and April updates yet). I'm using latest version of Veeam 7 with lated hotfix/patch.
Thanks
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 22
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Jan 25, 2013 5:05 pm
- Full Name: D W
- Contact:
Re: vSphere 5.5 Instant Recovery = Bad MBR?
Hi,
I just came across an issue where a restored VM could not boot and on another attempt, it booted but BSOD. This was from a VM that was backed up when shutdown. The VM works fine.
The difference with it compared to other VMs I have is that its Virutal Hardware is on vmx-10. What version is your VM on?
I just came across an issue where a restored VM could not boot and on another attempt, it booted but BSOD. This was from a VM that was backed up when shutdown. The VM works fine.
The difference with it compared to other VMs I have is that its Virutal Hardware is on vmx-10. What version is your VM on?
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31816
- Liked: 7302 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: vSphere 5.5 Instant Recovery = Bad MBR?
This is great, thanks for using SureBackup and catching this. Our devs would like to perform some tests around failing VMs, so anyone experiencing this, please open a support case. Hopefully, this should be easy to troubleshoot if the issue can be confirmed on powered off VM.r3zon8 wrote:A SureBackup job began failing recently
What is suspicious for me is that all 3 reports come together, could this be some recent ESXi 5.5 patch or something? This is certainly not a known issue. We will investigate. Our ESXi 5.5 lab does have all the latest updates installed though (build 1623387), and we are not seeing this issue.
Post your support case ID here, so that we could immediately escalate them into R&D.
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 20415
- Liked: 2302 times
- Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
- Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
- Contact:
Re: vSphere 5.5 Instant Recovery = Bad MBR?
The QA team is interested in the following:
1) What backup mode you're using?
2) What kind of backup repository you're using? Local repository or share?
Thanks.
1) What backup mode you're using?
2) What kind of backup repository you're using? Local repository or share?
Thanks.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 5
- Liked: never
- Joined: Apr 10, 2014 7:19 pm
- Full Name: hoffman gonzalez
- Contact:
Re: vSphere 5.5 Instant Recovery = Bad MBR?
Backup mode= virtual appliance(hot add disk to proxy)v.Eremin wrote:The QA team is interested in the following:
1) What backup mode you're using?
2) What kind of backup repository you're using? Local repository or share?
Thanks.
backup repository= windows server(2012 std)
proxy and repo roles are handled by the same machine
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 22
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Jan 25, 2013 5:05 pm
- Full Name: D W
- Contact:
Re: vSphere 5.5 Instant Recovery = Bad MBR?
I opened a ticket (#00563947) with my issue. I just updated it and added that I made a copy of the VM in question with VM Hardware 10 using VMWare Converter. I made the copy with VMWare Hardware 9.
Backup and Restore/Instant Recovery worked and booted fine.
Backup and Restore/Instant Recovery worked and booted fine.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 5
- Liked: never
- Joined: Apr 10, 2014 7:19 pm
- Full Name: hoffman gonzalez
- Contact:
Re: vSphere 5.5 Instant Recovery = Bad MBR?
can you explain a little better what you did?davow wrote:I opened a ticket (#00563947) with my issue. I just updated it and added that I made a copy of the VM in question with VM Hardware 10 using VMWare Converter. I made the copy with VMWare Hardware 9.
Backup and Restore/Instant Recovery worked and booted fine.
i understoof that you copied the VM using vmwareConverter? and when you set vmwareConvert to conver it as a vmhardware9 machine....what do those steps have to do with veeam?
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 20415
- Liked: 2302 times
- Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
- Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
- Contact:
Re: vSphere 5.5 Instant Recovery = Bad MBR?
I believe the point was the davow cloned the given VM, changing VM hardware from 10 to 9,then, backed it up, and restored this VM without issues. Thanks.
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 50
- Liked: 12 times
- Joined: Oct 21, 2010 8:54 am
- Full Name: Dmitry Vedyakov
- Contact:
Re: vSphere 5.5 Instant Recovery = Bad MBR?
I don't think that changing the hardware version is really needed.davow wrote:I made a copy of the VM in question with VM Hardware 10 using VMWare Converter.
Davow can you clone you'r 'bad' hardware 10 vm using vcenter clone operation? Preserve current hardware level.
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 22
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Jan 25, 2013 5:05 pm
- Full Name: D W
- Contact:
Re: vSphere 5.5 Instant Recovery = Bad MBR?
Hi,
Yes, Cloning the VM was one of the first things I tried. It did not fix the the issue. Downgrading to VM hardware 9 fixed the problem. I have updated the Support ticket and it was being escalated.
I have attached the BSOD screenshot to see an error.
Actually, I cannot see that I can attach screenshot. Anyway, the BSOD error is: UNMOUNTABLE_BOOT_VOLUME.
Yes, Cloning the VM was one of the first things I tried. It did not fix the the issue. Downgrading to VM hardware 9 fixed the problem. I have updated the Support ticket and it was being escalated.
I have attached the BSOD screenshot to see an error.
Actually, I cannot see that I can attach screenshot. Anyway, the BSOD error is: UNMOUNTABLE_BOOT_VOLUME.
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 22
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Jan 25, 2013 5:05 pm
- Full Name: D W
- Contact:
Re: vSphere 5.5 Instant Recovery = Bad MBR?
Hi,
Just to follow up on this thread. With the help of Veeam support, we can conclude that the VM in question is the issue. (For reasons unknown atm).
I used Vmware converter to make a copy of the VM and kept the virtual hardware at version 10. This new copy was then backed up and restored and then booted fine.
Just to follow up on this thread. With the help of Veeam support, we can conclude that the VM in question is the issue. (For reasons unknown atm).
I used Vmware converter to make a copy of the VM and kept the virtual hardware at version 10. This new copy was then backed up and restored and then booted fine.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 5
- Liked: never
- Joined: Apr 10, 2014 7:19 pm
- Full Name: hoffman gonzalez
- Contact:
Re: vSphere 5.5 Instant Recovery = Bad MBR?
VM i am having this error with is HardwareVersion 8; i dont believe the hardware version has to do with this issue.
i will try another instant restore and pass the bad/damaged instant restored VM through vmconverter and report back shortly.
i will try another instant restore and pass the bad/damaged instant restored VM through vmconverter and report back shortly.
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 10
- Liked: never
- Joined: Dec 05, 2009 7:27 am
- Full Name: Carl
- Contact:
Re: vSphere 5.5 Instant Recovery = Bad MBR?
Was this resolved? We're seeing a similar issue after updating to B&R 7 patch 4
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 26
- Liked: 12 times
- Joined: Jun 26, 2014 7:02 pm
- Full Name: Denis Churaev
- Location: Bucharest, Romania
- Contact:
Re: vSphere 5.5 Instant Recovery = Bad MBR?
Hello ckd5150, the users above tell that the issue was with the VM itself and it had nothing to do with hardware version. Did you try to go through the suggested step and perform a conversion?
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 20415
- Liked: 2302 times
- Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
- Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
- Contact:
Re: vSphere 5.5 Instant Recovery = Bad MBR?
We don't have a unified solution for this issue, as the cases described above differ from each other. So, please, open your own ticket with our support team and let them confirm your environment. Thanks.Was this resolved? We're seeing a similar issue after updating to B&R 7 patch 4
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 31 guests