Hello,
some of my backup jobs show the bottleneck to be throttling.
But this must be wrong since I have not set any throttling rules.
Moreover the statistic displays the target to be the real bottleneck, see below
09.01.2015 01:10:08 :: Busy: Source 24% > Proxy 9% > Network 10% > Target 99%
09.01.2015 01:10:08 :: Primary bottleneck: Throttling
Other jobs show realistic bottlenecks although the same repository and proxy is used.
Any idea about this?
Thanks!
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 38
- Liked: 9 times
- Joined: Mar 29, 2012 1:57 pm
- Full Name: D. Weide
- Contact:
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 27377
- Liked: 2800 times
- Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
- Contact:
Re: Wrong display of bottleneck: - throttling
Did you have any rules configured before by any chance? By saying "realistic bottlenecks" do you mean that you have target reported for other jobs?
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 38
- Liked: 9 times
- Joined: Mar 29, 2012 1:57 pm
- Full Name: D. Weide
- Contact:
Re: Wrong display of bottleneck: - throttling
- I did test storage latency control, but disabling it did not change the behaviour.Vitaliy S. wrote:Did you have any rules configured before by any chance
- The repositories have load control enabled (with both max concurrent tasks and data rate Limit set).
But again, some other jobs use the same repository without showing throttling as bottleneck.
- Apart from that I am not aware of any global network traffic rules ever beeing set.
I simply mean that throttling seems unrealistic when the Job statistics display >99% Target and the next lines states throttling - or do I simply misinterpret the meaning of throttling?Vitaliy S. wrote:By saying "realistic bottlenecks" do you mean that you have target reported for other jobs?
Most other jows writing to the same repository Show source as the bottleneck, one has Network.
Within the recent history I could only find a target bottleneck with a job writing to a realy slow external USB drive (but I used to see more target bottlenecks in the past before improving the target raid).
Just to make sure: I should only ever get throttling as bottleneck when I have a rule defined globally, right?
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: Wrong display of bottleneck: - throttling
As far as I can recall, ingestion rate settings are also considered as repository throttling (meaning that the speed of writing to repository is throttled) and can result in Throttling being reported as bottleneck.dweide wrote:- The repositories have load control enabled (with both max concurrent tasks and data rate Limit set).
That means that some other stages perform slower during their execution (probably, they use some other slower production storage, some other traffic route, or the repository itself is not loaded much with other tasks at that time).dweide wrote: But again, some other jobs use the same repository without showing throttling as bottleneck.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31812
- Liked: 7302 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Wrong display of bottleneck: - throttling
Foggy is 100% spot on.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 41 guests