Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
mkretzer
Veeam Legend
Posts: 1145
Liked: 388 times
Joined: Dec 17, 2015 7:17 am
Contact:

9.5U1

Post by mkretzer »

Hello,

we plan to migrate our biggest backup repo (~170 TB) to a REFS storage.

Is there any reason to wait for Update 1 for this operation? It will take a week to do all the active fulls to a temporal storage and another to get back to the original storage so it would be bad if there is a big bug with the REFS implementation.

Markus
foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 21070
Liked: 2115 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: 9.5U1

Post by foggy »

Hi Markus, I'm not aware of any Veeam B&R v9.5+ReFS integration issues reported so far, so I'd say starting migration right now is pretty safe. Just be sure to review this thread for some migration related tips. Thanks.
mkretzer
Veeam Legend
Posts: 1145
Liked: 388 times
Joined: Dec 17, 2015 7:17 am
Contact:

Re: 9.5U1

Post by mkretzer »

One slightly related question: If i copy the backup files and map after the next synthetic or active full the REFS benefits should work correct? Is that a valid way to prevent having to re-seed all our copy jobs (so that they still continue to work incrementally)?
foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 21070
Liked: 2115 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: 9.5U1

Post by foggy »

mkretzer wrote:One slightly related question: If i copy the backup files and map after the next synthetic or active full the REFS benefits should work correct?
Correct.
mkretzer wrote:Is that a valid way to prevent having to re-seed all our copy jobs (so that they still continue to work incrementally)?
Backup copy jobs should continue incrementally.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: sleti and 112 guests