Hello,
we plan to migrate our biggest backup repo (~170 TB) to a REFS storage.
Is there any reason to wait for Update 1 for this operation? It will take a week to do all the active fulls to a temporal storage and another to get back to the original storage so it would be bad if there is a big bug with the REFS implementation.
Markus
-
- Veeam Legend
- Posts: 1203
- Liked: 417 times
- Joined: Dec 17, 2015 7:17 am
- Contact:
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21138
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: 9.5U1
Hi Markus, I'm not aware of any Veeam B&R v9.5+ReFS integration issues reported so far, so I'd say starting migration right now is pretty safe. Just be sure to review this thread for some migration related tips. Thanks.
-
- Veeam Legend
- Posts: 1203
- Liked: 417 times
- Joined: Dec 17, 2015 7:17 am
- Contact:
Re: 9.5U1
One slightly related question: If i copy the backup files and map after the next synthetic or active full the REFS benefits should work correct? Is that a valid way to prevent having to re-seed all our copy jobs (so that they still continue to work incrementally)?
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21138
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: 9.5U1
Correct.mkretzer wrote:One slightly related question: If i copy the backup files and map after the next synthetic or active full the REFS benefits should work correct?
Backup copy jobs should continue incrementally.mkretzer wrote:Is that a valid way to prevent having to re-seed all our copy jobs (so that they still continue to work incrementally)?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Kirassant, Majestic-12 [Bot], miguel.salinas and 198 guests