Host-based backup of VMware vSphere VMs.
Post Reply
danswartz
Veteran
Posts: 264
Liked: 30 times
Joined: Apr 26, 2013 4:53 pm
Full Name: Dan Swartzendruber
Contact:

Linux proxy vs Windows?

Post by danswartz »

Due to licensing cost, my home lab had the 2 W2019 servers acting as proxies. I decided to spin up 3 linux proxies based, and tried out hotadd. Is it my imagination, or does linux hotplug/unplug more quickly than windows? Just curious (maybe it's subjective...)
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14322
Liked: 2890 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Linux proxy vs Windows?

Post by HannesK »

Hello,
maybe it's subjective
I would go for this one :-) I mean, we don't know whether there was some special configuration on your Windows 2019 machines. But overall, HotAdd process is something that happens on the VMware side. So the difference should not be related to the operating system of the proxy

Best regards,
Hannes
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31561
Liked: 6725 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Linux proxy vs Windows?

Post by Gostev »

Agree, I think hot add slowness is mostly caused by vSphere, not the OS itself. Remember, when you plug in USB drive to your Windows machine, the reaction is instant right? There's no long wait or anything.
As for sheer proxy throughput, it is more or less the same too. It can be slightly better or worse depending on Linux distro, but small differences overall (we did a lot of comparative performance testing).
danswartz
Veteran
Posts: 264
Liked: 30 times
Joined: Apr 26, 2013 4:53 pm
Full Name: Dan Swartzendruber
Contact:

Re: Linux proxy vs Windows?

Post by danswartz »

Eh, probably just one of those subjective things :)
soncscy
Veteran
Posts: 643
Liked: 312 times
Joined: Aug 04, 2019 2:57 pm
Full Name: Harvey
Contact:

Re: Linux proxy vs Windows?

Post by soncscy » 2 people like this post

I can't tell you if it's faster or slower, but it's 'fast enough for free' ;)
NickKulkarni
Enthusiast
Posts: 29
Liked: 7 times
Joined: Feb 08, 2021 6:11 pm
Full Name: Nicholas Kulkarni
Contact:

Re: Linux proxy vs Windows?

Post by NickKulkarni »

Can tell you that as opposed to the configuration we were using (production servers doubling as Proxy because of licence costs and multihomed to separate production traffic from backup traffic on the LAN) dedicated linux servers are simple, fast and cheap. I LOVE the Penguin! There is now a brilliant guide to creating a Linux based immutable backup appliance (see veeam-backup-replication-f2/build-an-im ... 79074.html) Big Thanks to Veeam for integrating Linux and Linux proxies into Veaam. Way to go Everyone!
danswartz
Veteran
Posts: 264
Liked: 30 times
Joined: Apr 26, 2013 4:53 pm
Full Name: Dan Swartzendruber
Contact:

Re: Linux proxy vs Windows?

Post by danswartz »

Very grateful as well. I have 2 ws2019 servers as DC (radius+dhcp+dns+AD), and having them have to act as proxies was annoying. I removed them from proxy role, and very happy at that...
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14322
Liked: 2890 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Linux proxy vs Windows?

Post by HannesK »

DC (radius+dhcp+dns+AD), and having them have to act as proxies was annoying.
uhm yes... a domain controller should never run any Veeam roles :D
danswartz
Veteran
Posts: 264
Liked: 30 times
Joined: Apr 26, 2013 4:53 pm
Full Name: Dan Swartzendruber
Contact:

Re: Linux proxy vs Windows?

Post by danswartz »

Well, at the time, given the cost of windows licenses for a home lab, I didn't see an alternative :( Hence, my gratitude at having 'the penguin' step into the role :)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 56 guests