Then they got a rude awakening when they tried to install the v13 appliance!
-
RubinCompServ
- Service Provider
- Posts: 431
- Liked: 150 times
- Joined: Mar 16, 2015 4:00 pm
- Full Name: David Rubin
- Contact:
VBR v13 GUI Performance
#SPLIT from System Requirements Page: Quick Survey
-
m.novelli
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 632
- Liked: 161 times
- Joined: Dec 29, 2009 12:48 pm
- Full Name: Marco Novelli
- Location: Asti - Italy
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
Agree... but you should also agree that VBR GUI / management has become a monster of slowness even on modern hardware
Always remember: we use 20% of features 80% of time. Maybe 10 / 90 with all features packed in VBR. I think Product Management should start to give an "Essentials" ISO to install just Backup / Replication and Cloud Export
Marco
Always remember: we use 20% of features 80% of time. Maybe 10 / 90 with all features packed in VBR. I think Product Management should start to give an "Essentials" ISO to install just Backup / Replication and Cloud Export
Marco
Ciao,
Marco
Marco
-
benthomas
- VeeaMVP
- Posts: 114
- Liked: 36 times
- Joined: Apr 22, 2013 2:29 am
- Full Name: Ben Thomas
- Location: New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: System Requirements Page: Quick Survey
Do you have all the AV Exceptions in place? I've found this to typically be the most common reason for the console feeling slow.
https://www.veeam.com/kb1999 has all of the exceptions need
If you're using Windows Defender, I wrote a blog recently about automating this - https://bcthomas.com/2026/02/automating ... xclusions/
Ben Thomas | Senior Solution Engineer @ Veeam | Veeam Vanguard 2023-2025 | VMCE | Microsoft MVP 2018-2025 | BCThomas.com
-
m.novelli
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 632
- Liked: 161 times
- Joined: Dec 29, 2009 12:48 pm
- Full Name: Marco Novelli
- Location: Asti - Italy
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
Nice, tomorrow I'm gonna try it
VBR 13 killed GUI performance on many of my Customers Servers
Marco
VBR 13 killed GUI performance on many of my Customers Servers
Marco
Ciao,
Marco
Marco
-
RubinCompServ
- Service Provider
- Posts: 431
- Liked: 150 times
- Joined: Mar 16, 2015 4:00 pm
- Full Name: David Rubin
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
Seems like the wrong thread for this...benthomas wrote: ↑Feb 16, 2026 8:29 pm Do you have all the AV Exceptions in place? I've found this to typically be the most common reason for the console feeling slow.
https://www.veeam.com/kb1999 has all of the exceptions need
If you're using Windows Defender, I wrote a blog recently about automating this - https://bcthomas.com/2026/02/automating ... xclusions/
-
Mildur
- Product Manager
- Posts: 11554
- Liked: 3247 times
- Joined: May 13, 2017 4:51 pm
- Full Name: Fabian K.
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
Hi guys,
Please don’t use the “System Requirements Page: Quick Survey” topic to discuss performance issues or product requests.
I’ve moved all comments not related to the system requirements pages into a new topic.
Best regards,
Fabian
Please don’t use the “System Requirements Page: Quick Survey” topic to discuss performance issues or product requests.
I’ve moved all comments not related to the system requirements pages into a new topic.
In addition to Ben’s suggestions, have you opened a case with our support team? If performance is not as expected, it should be properly investigated.Agree... but you should also agree that VBR GUI / management has become a monster of slowness even on modern hardware
Best regards,
Fabian
Product Management Analyst @ Veeam Software
-
m.novelli
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 632
- Liked: 161 times
- Joined: Dec 29, 2009 12:48 pm
- Full Name: Marco Novelli
- Location: Asti - Italy
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
I run the script on a Customer Server, GUI / management looks faster, thanks!
Marco
Marco
Ciao,
Marco
Marco
-
m.novelli
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 632
- Liked: 161 times
- Joined: Dec 29, 2009 12:48 pm
- Full Name: Marco Novelli
- Location: Asti - Italy
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
The script should be a flag in VBR Setup "Do you want to make Veeam faster? Yes or Yes"
Marco
Marco
Ciao,
Marco
Marco
-
CKNorth
- Novice
- Posts: 3
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: Sep 04, 2024 1:24 pm
- Full Name: Christian Keck
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
I also noticed that the GUI in v13 is way more sluggy than v12 was. Is it usind a new UI-engine?
This is not really a big deal for me, but the machine it runs on is quite fast, so I'm wondering what the reason could be.
This is not really a big deal for me, but the machine it runs on is quite fast, so I'm wondering what the reason could be.
-
kevin.boddy
- Service Provider
- Posts: 283
- Liked: 54 times
- Joined: Jan 30, 2018 3:24 pm
- Full Name: Kevin Boddy
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
Hi,
V13 GUI is very slow compared to V12.
What I don't get is why say "If performance is not as expected..."
How would I know what is expected or what is not expected from a new software build?
Should I always expect the new software to run that same or better than the pervious version? That's what this sounds like.
Thanks
Kevin
V13 GUI is very slow compared to V12.
What I don't get is why say "If performance is not as expected..."
How would I know what is expected or what is not expected from a new software build?
Should I always expect the new software to run that same or better than the pervious version? That's what this sounds like.
Thanks
Kevin
-
Mildur
- Product Manager
- Posts: 11554
- Liked: 3247 times
- Joined: May 13, 2017 4:51 pm
- Full Name: Fabian K.
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
“Expected” means that our customers are satisfied with the performance.
If the console feels slow or unresponsive, an investigation should be started.
The cause could be related to unoptimized SQL queries or code inefficiencies introduced in the new version — issues that we can address when we have the opportunity to perform a proper investigation using logs from the customer’s environment.
However, it could also be related to the available hardware resources for Veeam Backup & Replication and the database server.
Best regards,
Fabian
If the console feels slow or unresponsive, an investigation should be started.
The cause could be related to unoptimized SQL queries or code inefficiencies introduced in the new version — issues that we can address when we have the opportunity to perform a proper investigation using logs from the customer’s environment.
However, it could also be related to the available hardware resources for Veeam Backup & Replication and the database server.
Best regards,
Fabian
Product Management Analyst @ Veeam Software
-
DataDefender
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 28
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Dec 20, 2023 10:14 pm
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
-
kevin.boddy
- Service Provider
- Posts: 283
- Liked: 54 times
- Joined: Jan 30, 2018 3:24 pm
- Full Name: Kevin Boddy
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
Ok I'll log a case for your slow GUI.
What I don't understand is why your QA would not have picked this up when comparing it to V12. Surely you would do side by side testing.
Why is it left to customers to highlight these issues.
What I don't understand is why your QA would not have picked this up when comparing it to V12. Surely you would do side by side testing.
Why is it left to customers to highlight these issues.
-
irosinsk
- Novice
- Posts: 4
- Liked: 8 times
- Joined: Feb 16, 2026 4:46 pm
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
Just my two cents (to avoid this becoming a piling-on-fest), I haven't noticed any particular sluggishness in the v13 console vs. the v12 console. We did start fresh on v13 VSAs rather than upgrading our v12 Windows servers, so there could be something to "fresh small database vs. old large database", but I haven't seen a baked-in slowness at this time. Overall I've been fairly pleased that the VBR Console hasn't changed much since v12.
-
m.novelli
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 632
- Liked: 161 times
- Joined: Dec 29, 2009 12:48 pm
- Full Name: Marco Novelli
- Location: Asti - Italy
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
This script https://bcthomas.com/2026/02/automating ... xclusions/DataDefender wrote: ↑Feb 23, 2026 8:17 am Theres a script to improve GUI performance? Please tell me more. Or was it a script to setup the Antivirus Exclusions? I already did that by Hand.
powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File .\Set-VeeamDefenderExclusions.ps1 -Role BackupServer -IncludePostgreSQL
powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File .\Set-VeeamDefenderExclusions.ps1 -Role BackupInfrastructure -IncludeRepositoryExtensions
Marco
Ciao,
Marco
Marco
-
kevin.boddy
- Service Provider
- Posts: 283
- Liked: 54 times
- Joined: Jan 30, 2018 3:24 pm
- Full Name: Kevin Boddy
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
Case logged for the slow GUI on v13 #08010936.
We already had the AV exclusions, it makes no difference.
Performance just click around the interface is just horribly slow compared to v12.
The Support team seems to be treating this like there is some service that's broken, surely it would be easier for your teams to test v12 and v13 side by side in your labs, clicking through the menus.
You'll see it's half a second slower just doing simple things like that.
We already had the AV exclusions, it makes no difference.
Performance just click around the interface is just horribly slow compared to v12.
The Support team seems to be treating this like there is some service that's broken, surely it would be easier for your teams to test v12 and v13 side by side in your labs, clicking through the menus.
You'll see it's half a second slower just doing simple things like that.
-
m.novelli
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 632
- Liked: 161 times
- Joined: Dec 29, 2009 12:48 pm
- Full Name: Marco Novelli
- Location: Asti - Italy
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
I find so ugly that every new software is slower and slower. Windows Server 2025 GUI is sooooo sluggish. Sometimes I have opportunity to use some very old Windows Server 2003 or Windows Server 2008 R2 GUI inside some old VM and the GUI is so immediate and quick 
My Intel 2020 Mac (3,8 GHz 8-Core Intel Core i7 , 64 GB RAM) after updating to Tahoma OS become quite sluggish, I have fear to update to Sequoia...
When I click send button on an email using Modern Outlook I have to wait 1 - 2 secondo for the windows to disappear... wtf
Marco
My Intel 2020 Mac (3,8 GHz 8-Core Intel Core i7 , 64 GB RAM) after updating to Tahoma OS become quite sluggish, I have fear to update to Sequoia...
When I click send button on an email using Modern Outlook I have to wait 1 - 2 secondo for the windows to disappear... wtf
Marco
Ciao,
Marco
Marco
-
admd
- Service Provider
- Posts: 42
- Liked: 11 times
- Joined: Feb 22, 2024 1:37 pm
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
+1 , same issue for us, performance of the GUI in V13 is worse than V12. We manage multiple clients. It is only affecting daily operations.
-
FrancWest
- Veteran
- Posts: 560
- Liked: 127 times
- Joined: Sep 17, 2017 3:20 am
- Full Name: Franc
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
It’s not only the performance, but has more issues:
- scrolling through the list with the keyboard doesn’t automatically scroll the list. The selected row gets hidden below the details pane.
- clicking on a row in the job list when the details pane isn’t shown yet, results in the selected row getting hidden by the details pane which appears on top of it. You have to use the scrollbars for the selected row to appear.
- when the console is in full screen mode and you disconnect the RDP session and reconnect it again, the console is not maximized anymore, but the buttons on the top right corner of the window still shows it is.
This is all confirmed by support in case #07999009, but has a low priority to fix.
- scrolling through the list with the keyboard doesn’t automatically scroll the list. The selected row gets hidden below the details pane.
- clicking on a row in the job list when the details pane isn’t shown yet, results in the selected row getting hidden by the details pane which appears on top of it. You have to use the scrollbars for the selected row to appear.
- when the console is in full screen mode and you disconnect the RDP session and reconnect it again, the console is not maximized anymore, but the buttons on the top right corner of the window still shows it is.
This is all confirmed by support in case #07999009, but has a low priority to fix.
-
StephanHeier
- Service Provider
- Posts: 1
- Liked: 4 times
- Joined: Feb 22, 2017 2:20 pm
- Full Name: Stephan Heier
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
I’ll put this very carefully.
If version 13 were my first experience with Veeam, I wouldn’t use it because the GUI is too slow. It takes too long to display the results when sorting jobs. When you open the GUI, an outdated value is displayed for the first few seconds.
Please prioritize this ticket as soon as possible.
Stephan Heier
If version 13 were my first experience with Veeam, I wouldn’t use it because the GUI is too slow. It takes too long to display the results when sorting jobs. When you open the GUI, an outdated value is displayed for the first few seconds.
Please prioritize this ticket as soon as possible.
Stephan Heier
-
JeWe
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 80
- Liked: 12 times
- Joined: Mar 04, 2013 2:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
+1
It's also irritating if you click on HyperV-Hosts in inventory and it takes up to three seconds till the VMs are shown. Just one example.
In our case, as @FrancWest mentioned, after reconnecting RDP, the console isn't maximized anymore, but I can maximize it by clicking on the "Maximize"-Button again. Not critical, but annoying.
Low priority for a fix? Doesn't sound good, thought this was a Microsoft-exclusive way of saying "Well, we don't really care"
Regards,
Jens
It's also irritating if you click on HyperV-Hosts in inventory and it takes up to three seconds till the VMs are shown. Just one example.
In our case, as @FrancWest mentioned, after reconnecting RDP, the console isn't maximized anymore, but I can maximize it by clicking on the "Maximize"-Button again. Not critical, but annoying.
Low priority for a fix? Doesn't sound good, thought this was a Microsoft-exclusive way of saying "Well, we don't really care"
Regards,
Jens
-
m.novelli
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 632
- Liked: 161 times
- Joined: Dec 29, 2009 12:48 pm
- Full Name: Marco Novelli
- Location: Asti - Italy
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
I add the 20 GB ISO download "WTF? It's a backup software?"StephanHeier wrote: ↑Mar 16, 2026 8:32 am I’ll put this very carefully.
If version 13 were my first experience with Veeam, I wouldn’t use it because the GUI is too slow. It takes too long to display the results when sorting jobs. When you open the GUI, an outdated value is displayed for the first few seconds.
Please prioritize this ticket as soon as possible.
Stephan Heier
Marco
Ciao,
Marco
Marco
-
adamfindlay
- Service Provider
- Posts: 77
- Liked: 23 times
- Joined: Aug 04, 2016 1:22 pm
- Full Name: Adam Findlay
- Location: Leeds, England
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
installed across multiple sites and its way slower than V12 in all cases. Veeam is turning into Symantec...
-
m.novelli
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 632
- Liked: 161 times
- Joined: Dec 29, 2009 12:48 pm
- Full Name: Marco Novelli
- Location: Asti - Italy
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
Also I don't like the "flat" looking. v12 GUI was more colourful / contrasted
Marco
Marco
Ciao,
Marco
Marco
-
JeWe
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 80
- Liked: 12 times
- Joined: Mar 04, 2013 2:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
Just download the patch, ~3GBI add the 20 GB ISO download "WTF? It's a backup software?"
https://www.veeam.com/download_add_pack ... 10_update/
-
m.novelli
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 632
- Liked: 161 times
- Joined: Dec 29, 2009 12:48 pm
- Full Name: Marco Novelli
- Location: Asti - Italy
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
You are right JeWe, 20 GB initial download + 3 GB patches 
Marco
Marco
Ciao,
Marco
Marco
-
NewCom23
- Novice
- Posts: 3
- Liked: 6 times
- Joined: Mar 12, 2025 2:58 pm
- Full Name: Janek Meyer
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
Thanks for warning. I will wait with upgrading to v13.
Please share, if the problems are solved.
Please share, if the problems are solved.
-
Victor van Hoek SLTN
- Service Provider
- Posts: 6
- Liked: 3 times
- Joined: Mar 28, 2019 1:15 pm
- Full Name: Victor van Hoek
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
What about the possibility to select what Agents/Hypervisor support to install? Now I get all Agents/Hypervisors software installed and only need Windows Agent/VMware vSphere.... (as example)
Guess that should perform better.
Guess that should perform better.
-
eclipse4ever
- Influencer
- Posts: 10
- Liked: 5 times
- Joined: Dec 19, 2024 3:42 pm
- Full Name: Tim Hallgren
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
Using v13 as our VCC, upgraded from v12.
Keep getting an error stating that the console has "TooManyRequests," so our operations team keeps getting kicked out.
We have an ongoing support ticket, 08005217, but there is still no resolution.
"Can't login to consol on our VCC - TooManyRequests"
To solve the above, we restart the Veeam WebService, until next time.
v12 GUI was fast and performed well, with v13 it feels like the Sonos app all over again, too many features put into the backup product that the backup core features get pushed down by all the new features added.
Keep getting an error stating that the console has "TooManyRequests," so our operations team keeps getting kicked out.
We have an ongoing support ticket, 08005217, but there is still no resolution.
"Can't login to consol on our VCC - TooManyRequests"
To solve the above, we restart the Veeam WebService, until next time.
v12 GUI was fast and performed well, with v13 it feels like the Sonos app all over again, too many features put into the backup product that the backup core features get pushed down by all the new features added.
-
m.novelli
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 632
- Liked: 161 times
- Joined: Dec 29, 2009 12:48 pm
- Full Name: Marco Novelli
- Location: Asti - Italy
- Contact:
Re: VBR v13 GUI Performance
It's time for a Veeam Backup Light Edition with just 20% of features... enough for 80% of customersVictor van Hoek SLTN wrote: ↑Mar 16, 2026 12:54 pm What about the possibility to select what Agents/Hypervisor support to install? Now I get all Agents/Hypervisors software installed and only need Windows Agent/VMware vSphere.... (as example)
Guess that should perform better.
Pricing should be 50%
Marco
Ciao,
Marco
Marco
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 37 guests