Discussions related to exporting backups to tape and backing up directly to tape.
Post Reply
dgapinski
Enthusiast
Posts: 62
Liked: 4 times
Joined: Dec 05, 2013 8:09 pm
Full Name: Dan Gapinski
Contact:

Connecting a FC library to Fabric Interconnect = VM joy?

Post by dgapinski »

Hello,

I am trying to see if my thought is even possible. In my mind, I can imagine our Cisco UCS blades running VMware having no problem communicating to a Fiber Channel-connected tape library over the same fabric interconnect that connects the blades to our SAN. The goal provided would be to eliminate the last physical server; i.e., that Veeam can run within a VM on the blades. Is there any reason why this would not work? Our vendor was skeptical that this would in fact work.

Thanks for your thoughts!
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31460
Liked: 6648 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Connecting a FC library to Fabric Interconnect = VM joy?

Post by Gostev »

Hi, did you know that as per the vSphere 5.x Release Notes, VMware does not support Tape Drives connected directly to ESXi 5.x? Thanks!
quadstor
Novice
Posts: 5
Liked: 3 times
Joined: Dec 06, 2013 7:21 am
Contact:

Re: Connecting a FC library to Fabric Interconnect = VM joy?

Post by quadstor »

Would fibre channel/PCI passthrough work ? That way you are working directly with the tape devices from within the VM. Haven't tried it, just guessing that it might work.
Dima P.
Product Manager
Posts: 14396
Liked: 1568 times
Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
Full Name: Dmitry Popov
Location: Prague
Contact:

Re: Connecting a FC library to Fabric Interconnect = VM joy?

Post by Dima P. »

It might work - but that would be unsupported, and any unsupported configuration means "on your own risk'.
dgapinski
Enthusiast
Posts: 62
Liked: 4 times
Joined: Dec 05, 2013 8:09 pm
Full Name: Dan Gapinski
Contact:

Re: Connecting a FC library to Fabric Interconnect = VM joy?

Post by dgapinski »

Understood - things to consider then! Thanks for your responses, much appreciated.
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20271
Liked: 2252 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Connecting a FC library to Fabric Interconnect = VM joy?

Post by veremin »

Another problem with this scenario is that VB&R VM will be pinned down to the one specific host; which means most VMware features will not work (vMotion, Storage vMotion , HA , DRS). Thanks.
dgapinski
Enthusiast
Posts: 62
Liked: 4 times
Joined: Dec 05, 2013 8:09 pm
Full Name: Dan Gapinski
Contact:

Re: Connecting a FC library to Fabric Interconnect = VM joy?

Post by dgapinski »

Too bad that Finance put the clamp on us so that we cannot buy the library anymore and the question is moot. Thanks for the future answer to my future question tho!
Dima P.
Product Manager
Posts: 14396
Liked: 1568 times
Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
Full Name: Dmitry Popov
Location: Prague
Contact:

Re: Connecting a FC library to Fabric Interconnect = VM joy?

Post by Dima P. »

Dan,
Thank you for the heads up! If you wish you can test tape functionality with VTL like Falconstor or Quadstor - they are both pretty solid, however Quadstor is free.
stevenrodenburg1
Expert
Posts: 135
Liked: 20 times
Joined: May 31, 2011 9:11 am
Full Name: Steven Rodenburg
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Connecting a FC library to Fabric Interconnect = VM joy?

Post by stevenrodenburg1 »

Please note that using FC Tapedrives inside VM's through mechanisms like NPIV is a Pain. Don't even go down that path.
Use a physical server to control a tape-device.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests