I have multiple implementations of B&R at clients and most are configured as follows:
- backup equipment on separate physical network
- B&R device just runs B&R
- storage is QNAP with QuObjects, using S3 compatibility with immutability
However, I have a couple of clients with very large data sets ( ie., 8TB+ ) and the QNAP setup isn't reliable in these scenarios.
What is the recommended implementation to keep secure local and offsite backups?
For these 2 clients, I am thinking about dropping in Linux servers acting as hardened repositories. I would then drop a hardened linux server in an offsite data center and backup copy to that.
Would that be the best option?
OR... maybe use MinIO?
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 107
- Liked: 8 times
- Joined: Jan 19, 2022 4:48 pm
- Contact:
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 3485
- Liked: 584 times
- Joined: Aug 28, 2013 8:23 am
- Full Name: Petr Makarov
- Location: Prague, Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: Best Option for Secured Onsite and Offisite
Hello,
I believe that the hardened repository is a very good idea for both local and offsite backups, usually, I recommend using it whenever and wherever possible. Also, don't forget about encryption either source-side one or repository encryption for backups created by Veeam Agents operating in the standalone mode.
You may have a look at the best practices guide and this page of our user guide might be useful.
Thanks!
I believe that the hardened repository is a very good idea for both local and offsite backups, usually, I recommend using it whenever and wherever possible. Also, don't forget about encryption either source-side one or repository encryption for backups created by Veeam Agents operating in the standalone mode.
You may have a look at the best practices guide and this page of our user guide might be useful.
Thanks!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot] and 127 guests