-
- Novice
- Posts: 7
- Liked: never
- Joined: Feb 18, 2014 1:08 pm
- Contact:
LAN speed
I would like to know if the LAN speed of the Veeam server impacts the backup speed if the target repository is a NAS drive?
We have a Veeam Backup Server connected through a 1GB LAN connection. The target repository for our backups is a QNAP NAS with a 2GB trunk netowkr connection. Will we be seeing better performance if we team and trunk 2 netowkr cards on the Backup Server?
We have a Veeam Backup Server connected through a 1GB LAN connection. The target repository for our backups is a QNAP NAS with a 2GB trunk netowkr connection. Will we be seeing better performance if we team and trunk 2 netowkr cards on the Backup Server?
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 27377
- Liked: 2800 times
- Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
- Contact:
Re: LAN speed
Data transfer speed depends on the connection between proxy server and repository. Do use proxy server that is pre-installed together with the backup server? BTW, what are you current bottleneck stats fort the backup jobs?
-
- Novice
- Posts: 7
- Liked: never
- Joined: Feb 18, 2014 1:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: LAN speed
We're currently setting up our first installation, so no benchmarks yet.
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: LAN speed
You should run a test backup and see what the primary bottleneck would be. Chances are your target repository write speed will be the bottleneck and improving network throughput would not have much effect.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 213
- Liked: 26 times
- Joined: Feb 01, 2012 7:24 am
- Full Name: Espen Dykesteen
- Contact:
Re: LAN speed
Alexander, that depends very much on his other infrastructure, proxy performance, performance of the NAS, type and number for disks, disk/raid config, and off cause backup type and settings selected. Up to date proxy and source will easy max a 1GB link in my opinion. Unless the NAS is low end atom based device with a few spindles I think it will handle the writes just fine…..
Since you have not tested this yet, I could share some info since we use an OLD 8 bay QNAP box on some of your jobs. Disk array is RAID6+spare, so performance wise it is the worst setup.
However it has no problem saturating a 1 GB link. We currently use the other NIC on another subnet, so it is a long time since we had them trunked, but if I remember correctly it was still the network that was its limitation.
As long as source and proxy can handle the load I think 2GB trunk would be worth setting up. If you could share some more info on the environment and planned config of jobs, we might give you a better qualified guess.
But only way to be sure is to test
Since you have not tested this yet, I could share some info since we use an OLD 8 bay QNAP box on some of your jobs. Disk array is RAID6+spare, so performance wise it is the worst setup.
However it has no problem saturating a 1 GB link. We currently use the other NIC on another subnet, so it is a long time since we had them trunked, but if I remember correctly it was still the network that was its limitation.
As long as source and proxy can handle the load I think 2GB trunk would be worth setting up. If you could share some more info on the environment and planned config of jobs, we might give you a better qualified guess.
But only way to be sure is to test
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: LAN speed
Sure! The only thing I was trying to say is thatFiskepudding wrote:Alexander, that depends very much on his other infrastructure, proxy performance, performance of the NAS, type and number for disks, disk/raid config, and off cause backup type and settings selected.
Fiskepudding wrote:...only way to be sure is to test
-
- Expert
- Posts: 213
- Liked: 26 times
- Joined: Feb 01, 2012 7:24 am
- Full Name: Espen Dykesteen
- Contact:
Re: LAN speed
That did not come out right Alexander.
I guess that all I wanted to say was that I am a bit more optimistic then you, that a "random" qnap can write faster then 1GB link can provide.
I guess that all I wanted to say was that I am a bit more optimistic then you, that a "random" qnap can write faster then 1GB link can provide.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 54 guests