-
- Lurker
- Posts: 2
- Liked: never
- Joined: Sep 13, 2017 10:48 am
- Full Name: Abdussamed T
- Contact:
MS Exchange 2016 VMs & Database Backup Job best Practices
Dear Team,
One of our customer recently installed Veeam Backup & Replication 9.5 for exchange server backup.
Customer have MS Exchange 2016 (2 servers) configured as DAG (Database Availability Group) for DB Redundancy.
We need to know what is the best practices for Exchange 2016 Backup Jobs (for VMs & DB backup & Restoration).
Exchange Server Details:
OS: Windows server 2012R2
MS Exchange 2016 Standard
VMWare Esxi 6.5
One of our customer recently installed Veeam Backup & Replication 9.5 for exchange server backup.
Customer have MS Exchange 2016 (2 servers) configured as DAG (Database Availability Group) for DB Redundancy.
We need to know what is the best practices for Exchange 2016 Backup Jobs (for VMs & DB backup & Restoration).
Exchange Server Details:
OS: Windows server 2012R2
MS Exchange 2016 Standard
VMWare Esxi 6.5
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21165
- Liked: 2148 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: MS Exchange 2016 VMs & Database Backup Job best Practice
Hi Abdussamed, please review this thread and the best practices document as well and feel free to ask any additional questions.
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 2
- Liked: never
- Joined: Sep 13, 2017 10:48 am
- Full Name: Abdussamed T
- Contact:
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 2
- Liked: never
- Joined: Nov 19, 2015 3:09 pm
- Full Name: Lance Hammond
- Contact:
[MERGED] Exchange 2016 DAG Support
Looking for feedback.
Currently we have a physical deployment of Exchange 2010 configured in a DAG across two sites. If one site drops connection to the outside world, email is able to start flowing from the other site.
Goal - Ability for Exchange to failover between two sites (NO DOWNTIME) & granular restoration options
How granular can Veeam get with restorations, down to specific user mailbox?
We are entertaining the idea of virutalizing Exchange and moving to 2016.
The question is does it still make sense to configure a DAG?
Is there a recommended way to acheive our goal by utilizing Veeam that may provide more advantages than a DAG?
Thanks for any insight.
Currently we have a physical deployment of Exchange 2010 configured in a DAG across two sites. If one site drops connection to the outside world, email is able to start flowing from the other site.
Goal - Ability for Exchange to failover between two sites (NO DOWNTIME) & granular restoration options
How granular can Veeam get with restorations, down to specific user mailbox?
We are entertaining the idea of virutalizing Exchange and moving to 2016.
The question is does it still make sense to configure a DAG?
Is there a recommended way to acheive our goal by utilizing Veeam that may provide more advantages than a DAG?
Thanks for any insight.
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 6576
- Liked: 772 times
- Joined: May 19, 2015 1:46 pm
- Contact:
Re: MS Exchange 2016 VMs & Database Backup Job best Practice
Hi Lance and welcome to the community!
Thanks
Yes, down to mail, calendar, contacts.How granular can Veeam get with restorations, down to specific user mailbox?
You can combine both, actually. Aside of useful resources already mentioned by foggy, this whitepaper is also worth checking.Is there a recommended way to achieve our goal by utilizing Veeam that may provide more advantages than a DAG?
Thanks
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 2
- Liked: never
- Joined: Nov 19, 2015 3:09 pm
- Full Name: Lance Hammond
- Contact:
Re: MS Exchange 2016 VMs & Database Backup Job best Practice
Thank you, I will check out that information.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: anthonyspiteri79, Google [Bot], Gostev and 154 guests