Availability for the Always-On Enterprise
Scouserste81
Novice
Posts: 7
Liked: 7 times
Joined: Sep 28, 2012 2:27 pm
Contact:

NFS Repository on QNAP Appliance

Post by Scouserste81 » Sep 28, 2012 2:36 pm

I am attempting to setup a connection to a NFS share. This is from Veeam installed on a physical server running Windows server 2008.

The NFS share is on a QNAP 879U-RP NAS appliance. This device is Linux based. QNAP have already diagnosed the NAS and confirmed all NFS components are functional.

I can connect to the device via SSH with an account that has root access.

Veeam fails during the configuration of the repository, when I click Browse to see shares, this show a timeout message.

If I specify the path manually I can get to the end of the wizard but receive the following.

28/09/2012 09:54:31 Fail Failed to save Backup Repository: Timed out waiting for operation \"(cd /tmp && perl veeam_soap1ceeab78-ca04-4e32-9538-cb66fd124939.pl -d -c -l lib1ceeab78-ca04-4e32-9538-cb66fd124939 -e /tmp/veeam_error1ceeab78-ca04-4e32-9538-cb66fd124939 2>> /tmp/veeam_error1ceeab78-ca04-4e32-9538-cb66fd124939) || cat /tmp/veeam_error1ceeab78-ca04-4e32-9538-cb66fd124939 2>&1\", timeout: 100000 ms

Help on this would be greatly appreciated.

I also have an open ticket with support ID#5218305

chrisdearden
Expert
Posts: 1530
Liked: 225 times
Joined: Jul 21, 2010 9:47 am
Full Name: Chris Dearden
Contact:

Re: NFS Repository on QNAP Appliance

Post by chrisdearden » Sep 28, 2012 4:15 pm

I dont know if the QNAP supports the required perl components to install a repository server. You would need to mount the NFS share to a linux VM and use that. It would probably be a lot easier to present a CIFS/SMB share and use that as a target.

dellock6
Veeam Software
Posts: 5485
Liked: 1507 times
Joined: Jul 26, 2009 3:39 pm
Full Name: Luca Dell'Oca
Location: Varese, Italy
Contact:

Re: NFS Repository on QNAP Appliance

Post by dellock6 » Sep 28, 2012 9:18 pm

Already tested this in the past, Qnap (as many other nas storages) have embedded and stripped linux distro onboard, and you cannot really manage them as pure linux servers. As Chris said, the best way to use a Qnap is to create a CIFS share on it and register it in Veeam Server.

Luca.
Luca Dell'Oca
EMEA Cloud Architect @ Veeam Software

@dellock6
http://www.virtualtothecore.com/en/
vExpert 2011-2012-2013-2014-2015-2016-2017-2018
Veeam VMCE #1

linux4guru
Enthusiast
Posts: 40
Liked: never
Joined: Aug 24, 2011 8:26 pm
Full Name: Thomas Lam
Contact:

Re: NFS Repository on QNAP Appliance

Post by linux4guru » Sep 28, 2012 9:26 pm

I have used QNAP and Veeam but I was only able to use iSCSI protocol. I was not able to get NFS or CIFS to work at all. iSCSI works great for me over a dedicated 192.x.x.x network via a crossover CAT6 cable.

qnapjauss
Lurker
Posts: 1
Liked: never
Joined: Oct 01, 2012 9:01 am
Full Name: Jauss
Contact:

Re: NFS Repository on QNAP Appliance

Post by qnapjauss » Oct 01, 2012 10:30 am

Hi,

Veeam Backup and Replication is compatible with QNAP Turbo NAS.
You can see the compatibility list in www.qnap.com/compatibility

Veeam can be used easily with a CIFS backup repository, or iSCSI backup repository.
For CIFS backup repository, Active Directory user or local NAS user can be used.

The QNAP NAS do not include PERL in its system, that is required to add a Linux server in Veeam.

BR,
Jauss

verre
Enthusiast
Posts: 67
Liked: never
Joined: Jun 30, 2014 1:51 pm
Full Name: Valentino Erre
Contact:

[MERGED] Proxy and nas repository

Post by verre » Oct 09, 2014 10:12 am

Hi everyone, I've a question. I'm setting up an infrastructure with the following components:
- virtual environment: VMware vsphere 5.1
- repository for backups: Nas Qnap
- Proxy: virtual machine in hot add

The question is: what's the best way to make proxy and nas communicate each other? Currently I've just add a virtual nic to the proxy vm and configure it to communicate to qnap using NFS protocol: or it could be better CIFS or iSCSI? I've thought that iSCSI could give me the possibility to use the Round Robin load balancing policy (adding a second nic and portgroup to the virtual switch)...could it be an improvement?

Thank you all

foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 16811
Liked: 1358 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: NFS Repository on QNAP Appliance

Post by foggy » Oct 09, 2014 3:46 pm

Valentino, basically, iSCSI looks more preferable for this kind of setup. Please review considerations above, as well as another existing topic.

verre
Enthusiast
Posts: 67
Liked: never
Joined: Jun 30, 2014 1:51 pm
Full Name: Valentino Erre
Contact:

Re: NFS Repository on QNAP Appliance

Post by verre » Oct 10, 2014 3:17 pm

I've read that post. I have a doubt: if I have a proxy which collect the data from the source then sends the data to a WIN/LNX server (in which it is installed the transport service), how they communicate? With which protocol? And in case of that machine is WIN ... could it make sense to promote it as Proxy?
Tnks

foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 16811
Liked: 1358 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: NFS Repository on QNAP Appliance

Post by foggy » Oct 10, 2014 9:21 pm

verre wrote:I've read that post. I have a doubt: if I have a proxy which collect the data from the source then sends the data to a WIN/LNX server (in which it is installed the transport service), how they communicate? With which protocol?
It uses TCP. You can review all the required connections and ports in the corresponding user guide section.
verre wrote:And in case of that machine is WIN ... could it make sense to promote it as Proxy?
If that server is added to Veeam B&R console as repository, it already has all the required components installed.

verre
Enthusiast
Posts: 67
Liked: never
Joined: Jun 30, 2014 1:51 pm
Full Name: Valentino Erre
Contact:

Re: NFS Repository on QNAP Appliance

Post by verre » Oct 14, 2014 12:02 pm

Thank you. I still having some doubt. In that post they suggest to connect the proxy to qnap using iSCSI, but I don't understand why it is better...
The options to connect qnap to my virtual machine proxy are:
1- connect qnap in iSCSI to ESX and expose a LUN in RDM to my proxy as NTFS local (DAS) repository
2- connect qnap to proxy using iSCSI initiator inside the guest and use it as NTFS local (DAS) repository
3- connect qnap to proxy as CIFS share
4- connect qnap to proxy as NFS share

I don't understand which one (and why) could be better....

foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 16811
Liked: 1358 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: NFS Repository on QNAP Appliance

Post by foggy » Oct 15, 2014 2:02 pm

I would say there's no universal answer (the one that would always be better than others). Either one can serve better in this or that environment, depending on a dozen of factors. I've just pointed out what others typically do, however you can try and verify which works better for you.

Btw, here's another thread discussing different setups.

verre
Enthusiast
Posts: 67
Liked: never
Joined: Jun 30, 2014 1:51 pm
Full Name: Valentino Erre
Contact:

Re: NFS Repository on QNAP Appliance

Post by verre » Oct 28, 2014 10:48 am

I've found this image that let me a little bewildered

Image

as you can see in each scenarios there is the opportunuty to install the transport service (I suppose the backup repository in first scenario couldn't be a qnap)
my question is: if I can choose between the first and second scenario (therefore it isn't a problem to have a second windows machine for proxy) ...which one is better and why?

verre
Enthusiast
Posts: 67
Liked: never
Joined: Jun 30, 2014 1:51 pm
Full Name: Valentino Erre
Contact:

Re: NFS Repository on QNAP Appliance

Post by verre » Oct 28, 2014 11:44 am

Image

foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 16811
Liked: 1358 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: NFS Repository on QNAP Appliance

Post by foggy » Oct 28, 2014 12:02 pm

You're correct that QNAP most likely cannot serve as backup repository in the first scenario (no ability to install data move agent on it). However if you could choose between them, the first one would generally be preferred due to the ability to write data locally.

verre
Enthusiast
Posts: 67
Liked: never
Joined: Jun 30, 2014 1:51 pm
Full Name: Valentino Erre
Contact:

Re: NFS Repository on QNAP Appliance

Post by verre » Oct 28, 2014 1:53 pm

Ok therefore the aren't any advantages to put another proxy in the remote site (it should be better for replica due to compressed data to transfer, but not for backups)...is it true?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mkretzer and 20 guests