Gostev wrote:Hi Jeremy, no it is not possible to build new full outside backup job or specify individual locations for VBK, VIB and VRB files.
Gostev wrote:Please clarify why do you need to create synthetic full offsite?
tsightler wrote:This is a great feature request, and one I have previously indicated would be an excellent idea. We currently get similar functionality by basically, running two Veeam jobs, one to local storage, and a second to remote Linux target. That way, synthetic fulls are performed locally and remotely, without significant WAN impact. It would be really nice to, instead of running two jobs, actually rsync the local incremental to the remote site and have the remote site be able to create the synthetic fulls by running some standalone utility.
Of course, a nice, WAN efficient, asynchronous replication built into Veeam would pretty much solve this issue on it's own.
Mindflux wrote:There was a post by someone who said all their remote backups were taking forever even though both the source/destination were remote. Support confirmed that the data had to travel TWICE over wan (once each way) to back up with veeam without a local install
How is yours different or am I misunderstanding you?
Gostev wrote:Sounds good. Will see what we can do in the next releases to facilitate this.
virtualwatts wrote:Our WAN cannot handle the VBK push each night. Backing up from DR would be impractical as well for same reason.
Our ultimate desire is to push VIB files to a DR and have the Veeam in the DR import and synth full.
Gostev wrote:Hi Rick, so why you cannot use what tsightler had shared above for now?
Vitaliy S. wrote:George, have you considered using rsync in this case? We recommend using rsync to sync backup files offsite. You can search this forum for offsite and rsync for more information on this.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest