Hi,
I was wondering if anyone has more insight regarding which option is better for a Server 2016 dedup repository. Up until now I used General purpose file server, but now I see another option called Virtualized Backup Server. From what I read it is optimized for HyperV VMs using a VHD as repo residing on a the dedup volume.
Will this be a better option than General Purpose File Server?
Thanks
-
- Expert
- Posts: 224
- Liked: 25 times
- Joined: Apr 30, 2013 7:38 am
- Full Name: Vlad Valeriu Velciu
- Contact:
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 8191
- Liked: 1322 times
- Joined: Feb 08, 2013 3:08 pm
- Full Name: Mike Resseler
- Location: Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Virtualized Backup Server option for 2016 Dedup
Hi Vlad,
Yes, this option is better. For reference... This is what it means in terms of settings:
* Priority optimization
* Default optimization policy: Minimum file age = 0 days / Optimize in-use files = Yes / Optimize partial files = No
* "Under-the-hood" tweaks for interop with virtualized backup type of solutions.
I discussed this with MSFT 2 weeks ago with the responsible PM for it, and he confirmed that those under-the-hood tweaks are generic and aimed at everyone and not at their backup solution alone.
Hope it helps
Mike
Yes, this option is better. For reference... This is what it means in terms of settings:
* Priority optimization
* Default optimization policy: Minimum file age = 0 days / Optimize in-use files = Yes / Optimize partial files = No
* "Under-the-hood" tweaks for interop with virtualized backup type of solutions.
I discussed this with MSFT 2 weeks ago with the responsible PM for it, and he confirmed that those under-the-hood tweaks are generic and aimed at everyone and not at their backup solution alone.
Hope it helps
Mike
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 245 guests