Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
Posts: 223
Liked: 25 times
Joined: Apr 30, 2013 7:38 am
Full Name: Vlad Valeriu Velciu

Virtualized Backup Server option for 2016 Dedup

Post by VladV »


I was wondering if anyone has more insight regarding which option is better for a Server 2016 dedup repository. Up until now I used General purpose file server, but now I see another option called Virtualized Backup Server. From what I read it is optimized for HyperV VMs using a VHD as repo residing on a the dedup volume.

Will this be a better option than General Purpose File Server?


Mike Resseler
Product Manager
Posts: 6157
Liked: 719 times
Joined: Feb 08, 2013 3:08 pm
Full Name: Mike Resseler
Location: Belgium

Re: Virtualized Backup Server option for 2016 Dedup

Post by Mike Resseler » 1 person likes this post

Hi Vlad,

Yes, this option is better. For reference... This is what it means in terms of settings:

* Priority optimization
* Default optimization policy: Minimum file age = 0 days / Optimize in-use files = Yes / Optimize partial files = No

* "Under-the-hood" tweaks for interop with virtualized backup type of solutions.

I discussed this with MSFT 2 weeks ago with the responsible PM for it, and he confirmed that those under-the-hood tweaks are generic and aimed at everyone and not at their backup solution alone.

Hope it helps


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MartyZ, oleg.feoktistov, Samba222 and 79 guests