-
- Veeam Legend
- Posts: 364
- Liked: 56 times
- Joined: Jun 30, 2015 9:13 am
- Full Name: Stephan Lang
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Storage Integration, DirectSAN with Linux Repository and Netapp over FC
Hello there, anybody having ah good advice for me, getting following error trying to rescan my Netapp Appliances:
Error Failed to obtain list of VMs on LUN vmstore.lun of volume fcp1_vmstore - Error: Cannot find ONTAP initiator group for any existing backup proxy server
so volumes and vms get gathered correctly from the netapp "admin" (web) interfaces, but as soon as the volume clone/map/rescan operations should start it fails..
using an RHEL Linux HPE Apollo machine with FC Adapters, SAN zoning etc. does work, as i can manuall map volumes to the Linux Servers, i can rescan the hba's i'll see the disks in fdisk and also multipath tool... i even think its not even that far that the linux proxy trys to connect to the netapp volumes it fails allready before...
i didn't find any more requirements regarding "software" packages that maybe veeam needs in rhel/linux to be able to gater hba informations, rhel is installed as minimalistcly as possible, only added the dm-multipath and sysfsutils
in storage rescan veeam looks like to scan what igroups are configured on the netapp and "compares" ? it to information in its database? so either the netapp does not provide the information to the rescan process to veeam, or in the database of veeam the ww(p)n's of my hba's are missing? idk...
in logs there isn't any more helpful hint other then the same line of error above...
Error Failed to obtain list of VMs on LUN vmstore.lun of volume fcp1_vmstore - Error: Cannot find ONTAP initiator group for any existing backup proxy server
so volumes and vms get gathered correctly from the netapp "admin" (web) interfaces, but as soon as the volume clone/map/rescan operations should start it fails..
using an RHEL Linux HPE Apollo machine with FC Adapters, SAN zoning etc. does work, as i can manuall map volumes to the Linux Servers, i can rescan the hba's i'll see the disks in fdisk and also multipath tool... i even think its not even that far that the linux proxy trys to connect to the netapp volumes it fails allready before...
i didn't find any more requirements regarding "software" packages that maybe veeam needs in rhel/linux to be able to gater hba informations, rhel is installed as minimalistcly as possible, only added the dm-multipath and sysfsutils
in storage rescan veeam looks like to scan what igroups are configured on the netapp and "compares" ? it to information in its database? so either the netapp does not provide the information to the rescan process to veeam, or in the database of veeam the ww(p)n's of my hba's are missing? idk...
in logs there isn't any more helpful hint other then the same line of error above...
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 15166
- Liked: 3249 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: Storage Integration, DirectSAN with Linux Repository and Netapp over FC
Hello,
That sounds like a technical issue. Please provide a support case ID for this issue, as requested when you click New Topic.
Without case number, the topic will eventually be
deleted by moderators.
Best regards,
Hannes
PS: support can only help if you upload logs https://www.veeam.com/kb1832
That sounds like a technical issue. Please provide a support case ID for this issue, as requested when you click New Topic.
Without case number, the topic will eventually be
deleted by moderators.
Best regards,
Hannes
PS: support can only help if you upload logs https://www.veeam.com/kb1832
-
- Veeam Legend
- Posts: 364
- Liked: 56 times
- Joined: Jun 30, 2015 9:13 am
- Full Name: Stephan Lang
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: Storage Integration, DirectSAN with Linux Repository and Netapp over FC
opened case and upload logs right now:
Case # 05027931
Case # 05027931
-
- Veeam Legend
- Posts: 364
- Liked: 56 times
- Joined: Jun 30, 2015 9:13 am
- Full Name: Stephan Lang
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: Storage Integration, DirectSAN with Linux Repository and Netapp over FC
no one using Linux Repos with Storage Integration? still trying to find ah solution with Support, but not got any step further... 

-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 15166
- Liked: 3249 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: Storage Integration, DirectSAN with Linux Repository and Netapp over FC
Hello,
sorry for the inconvenience. I just checked the case and it looks like the engineer did not realize that it seems to be a known issue which happens in specific scenarios. So it's not a general issue and chances are low that someone external can help with that.
The case should be escalated soon.
Best regards,
Hannes
sorry for the inconvenience. I just checked the case and it looks like the engineer did not realize that it seems to be a known issue which happens in specific scenarios. So it's not a general issue and chances are low that someone external can help with that.
The case should be escalated soon.
Best regards,
Hannes
-
- Veeam Legend
- Posts: 364
- Liked: 56 times
- Joined: Jun 30, 2015 9:13 am
- Full Name: Stephan Lang
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: Storage Integration, DirectSAN with Linux Repository and Netapp over FC
i think i found the issue today! gonna check everything now and will also inform support...
basically it's not directly ah bug, but VBR could also made it better to not stop the host rescan job instead ignores it...
somehow on the HPE (Apollo) Server there is ah SD Slot, and Linux does recognize this slot and showed it as /dev/sdc, host rescan in veeam failed with "no medium" -> same message as when trying to mount device manually... sure no sdcard was in it, it did costs me some time to find out the /dev/sdc was the sd card slot, after disabling the sdcard slot in bios of the server the sdc went free and error in veeam also disappeared and rescan of host and subsequent storage/vol-lun rescans also started to working!
only thing that i can just speculate, i've got 2 identical hosts, only one had the issue for now, but also this was the only one with the proxy role allready on it.. so it might be just the case that the host rescan, rescans volumes/disks only when proxy service is installed...
so either way, disabling sdslot helped but in my opinion also the host rescan should ignore the failure instead of aborting the rescan job!
for the search engine, this was the error messages i got in the host discovery job:
basically it's not directly ah bug, but VBR could also made it better to not stop the host rescan job instead ignores it...
somehow on the HPE (Apollo) Server there is ah SD Slot, and Linux does recognize this slot and showed it as /dev/sdc, host rescan in veeam failed with "no medium" -> same message as when trying to mount device manually... sure no sdcard was in it, it did costs me some time to find out the /dev/sdc was the sd card slot, after disabling the sdcard slot in bios of the server the sdc went free and error in veeam also disappeared and rescan of host and subsequent storage/vol-lun rescans also started to working!
only thing that i can just speculate, i've got 2 identical hosts, only one had the issue for now, but also this was the only one with the proxy role allready on it.. so it might be just the case that the host rescan, rescans volumes/disks only when proxy service is installed...
so either way, disabling sdslot helped but in my opinion also the host rescan should ignore the failure instead of aborting the rescan job!
for the search engine, this was the error messages i got in the host discovery job:
[servername] Refresh Linux host failed Error: No medium found
POSIX: Failed to open file [/dev/sdc].
Agent failed to process method {DiskManagement.QueryScsiDiskPath}.
[servername] Disks discovery failed Error: No medium found
POSIX: Failed to open file [/dev/sdc].
Agent failed to process method {DiskManagement.QueryScsiDiskPath}.
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 727
- Liked: 161 times
- Joined: Jan 22, 2015 2:39 pm
- Full Name: Stefan Renner
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Storage Integration, DirectSAN with Linux Repository and Netapp over FC
Hi,
glad you found the answer and thanks for posting the solution here.
We will also check in our labs.
Thanks again
glad you found the answer and thanks for posting the solution here.
We will also check in our labs.
Thanks again
Stefan Renner
Veeam PMA
Veeam PMA
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 32
- Liked: 3 times
- Joined: Jan 19, 2018 6:32 am
- Contact:
Re: Storage Integration, DirectSAN with Linux Repository and Netapp over FC
Hello, we have the same error here.
Where did you disabled the sdslot? In ILO or in linux?
Where did you disabled the sdslot? In ILO or in linux?
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 727
- Liked: 161 times
- Joined: Jan 22, 2015 2:39 pm
- Full Name: Stefan Renner
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Storage Integration, DirectSAN with Linux Repository and Netapp over FC
Seems the best way is to disable it in BIOS.
With that the OS will not see it at all.
Stefan Renner
Veeam PMA
Veeam PMA
-
- Veeam Legend
- Posts: 364
- Liked: 56 times
- Joined: Jun 30, 2015 9:13 am
- Full Name: Stephan Lang
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: Storage Integration, DirectSAN with Linux Repository and Netapp over FC
yes disabled SD Slot in BIOS! i think this should match, its kinda hidden in the menus..: https://techlibrary.hpe.com/docs/iss/pr ... _slot.html
its the "internalSD" Slot thats located on the Systemboard, where someone might install ESXi on that SDCard (what you shouldn't do either

-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 32
- Liked: 3 times
- Joined: Jan 19, 2018 6:32 am
- Contact:
Re: Storage Integration, DirectSAN with Linux Repository and Netapp over FC
Our server was an windows server before. windows doesn't has the problem with rescanning. We try to disable it in bios.
@Veeam, changing sourcecode is needed, that rescanning is possible with an active sdslot and some informations in Documentation Center might be helpful.
Thanks
@Veeam, changing sourcecode is needed, that rescanning is possible with an active sdslot and some informations in Documentation Center might be helpful.
Thanks
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 15166
- Liked: 3249 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: Storage Integration, DirectSAN with Linux Repository and Netapp over FC
yes, it's tracked as bug #291165 as far as I see, but it's not fixed yet.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: alex1992, dloseke, Semrush [Bot] and 53 guests