- Parallel Processing for GFS
cmaier wrote:You are right, but I expect to use backup to tape jobs later, too. So it would be interesting to discuss this anyway because the questions stay the same. The GFS media pools make no sense to me if they don't provide a solution for the daily incremental backups. I think there is no scenario where no incrementals are included in the backup chain. And there is no way to run incremental jobs without a full backup.
If, however, that tape was previously not available in the library when a tape was needed that tape is no longer appendable.
If this type of functionality and efficient use of tapes is available currently, please provide clarity as it eludes me.
Dima P. wrote:If the latest media set’s tape is not present when tape job starts, another tape will be used instead. Previous one will be counted as ‘closed’ to keep the media set sequence.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest