-
- Expert
- Posts: 149
- Liked: 15 times
- Joined: Jan 02, 2015 7:12 pm
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Hello,
Its been two years since I checked in on this feature request, is catalyst integrated copy ever going to be a reality? The lack of this feature is causing huge headaches for our company. Yuuuuge!
Nick
Its been two years since I checked in on this feature request, is catalyst integrated copy ever going to be a reality? The lack of this feature is causing huge headaches for our company. Yuuuuge!
Nick
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31814
- Liked: 7302 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Yes Nick, it is still planned. While this feature was indeed requested two years ago, considering that only a small portion of Veeam customers will benefit from one I could not possibly prioritize it above existing commitments and high priority features important for the majority of our users. Additionally, this particular feature has to be taken care of by the specific R&D subteam, which has been quite overloaded in the past couple of years.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 149
- Liked: 15 times
- Joined: Jan 02, 2015 7:12 pm
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Gostev,
This line is taken from the Help file of version 9.5.
"This mechanism helps improve performance of primary backup jobs AND backup copy jobs that are scheduled to create periodic archive full backups (GFS)."
Is this line a typo, or am I missing something and the Remote StoreOnce unit should be using Catalyst on the target side to transform the GFS restore points that Veeam Backup Copy already moved? I have GFS transformations running into the hundreds of hours on remote catalyst stores, where synthetic fulls on catalyst stores take a few hours at most on primary backup jobs.
One example is running 217 hours as of this post and its Merging oldest restore point into full backup file [GFS] (93% done) @ 217 hours and Compacting full backup file (82% done) @ 217 hours. and Creating synthetic full restore point < Date > for 217 hours and no percentage.
Thanks,
Nick
From the Help Center:
Synthetic Full Backups
HP StoreOnce Catalyst improves synthetic full backup file creation and transformation performance. When Veeam Backup & Replication creates or transforms a synthetic full backup, HPE StoreOnce does not physically copy data between the existing backup chain and the target full backup file. Instead, it performs a metadata-only operation — updates pointers to existing data blocks on the storage device. As a result, the operation completes much faster. This mechanism helps improve performance of primary backup jobs and backup copy jobs that are scheduled to create periodic archive full backups (GFS).
This line is taken from the Help file of version 9.5.
"This mechanism helps improve performance of primary backup jobs AND backup copy jobs that are scheduled to create periodic archive full backups (GFS)."
Is this line a typo, or am I missing something and the Remote StoreOnce unit should be using Catalyst on the target side to transform the GFS restore points that Veeam Backup Copy already moved? I have GFS transformations running into the hundreds of hours on remote catalyst stores, where synthetic fulls on catalyst stores take a few hours at most on primary backup jobs.
One example is running 217 hours as of this post and its Merging oldest restore point into full backup file [GFS] (93% done) @ 217 hours and Compacting full backup file (82% done) @ 217 hours. and Creating synthetic full restore point < Date > for 217 hours and no percentage.
Thanks,
Nick
From the Help Center:
Synthetic Full Backups
HP StoreOnce Catalyst improves synthetic full backup file creation and transformation performance. When Veeam Backup & Replication creates or transforms a synthetic full backup, HPE StoreOnce does not physically copy data between the existing backup chain and the target full backup file. Instead, it performs a metadata-only operation — updates pointers to existing data blocks on the storage device. As a result, the operation completes much faster. This mechanism helps improve performance of primary backup jobs and backup copy jobs that are scheduled to create periodic archive full backups (GFS).
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 1
- Liked: never
- Joined: Oct 29, 2018 10:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
We recently purchased Veeam with the understanding that Catalyst Copy would be available soon. However from what you're saying, it sounds as if it is planned but not any time soon. This is quite concerning as this functionality is a high priority for us. Now I'm left wondering if we shouldn't have looked the other products that do include Catalyst Copy.Gostev wrote: ↑Oct 26, 2018 5:30 pm Yes Nick, it is still planned. While this feature was indeed requested two years ago, considering that only a small portion of Veeam customers will benefit from one I could not possibly prioritize it above existing commitments and high priority features important for the majority of our users. Additionally, this particular feature has to be taken care of by the specific R&D subteam, which has been quite overloaded in the past couple of years.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31814
- Liked: 7302 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Nick - yes, Catalyst should be used there. May be it is in fact used, and the reason for slowness is different? Please investigate this with support.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 149
- Liked: 15 times
- Joined: Jan 02, 2015 7:12 pm
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
I have a current case open: Case # 03260431 (opened at the request of Channel Partner support via Veeam)
I have had previous cases open on the same issue/concern in the past. With no resolution, thus far. As far as I can tell, the problem is the 'compaction' of the file into new vbk files.
Thanks,
Nick
I have had previous cases open on the same issue/concern in the past. With no resolution, thus far. As far as I can tell, the problem is the 'compaction' of the file into new vbk files.
Thanks,
Nick
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Any chance you've recently removed some VMs from the source job?
-
- Expert
- Posts: 149
- Liked: 15 times
- Joined: Jan 02, 2015 7:12 pm
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
There is always a chance, we have thousands of vms. But this behavior is consistent across the 51 currently configured copy jobs, many of which I know haven't had any server retirements. Under the advanced settings on the job, all the Health and "remove Deleted items" are unchecked. I have a webex later today with support to look at job settings, but i see some interesting things in the logs but they could mean something else completely from what I'm interpreting.
Nick
Nick
-
- VeeaMVP
- Posts: 1007
- Liked: 314 times
- Joined: Jan 31, 2011 11:17 am
- Full Name: Max
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
I hope I don't misunderstand you.
Catalyst is used for Backup Copy jobs from your primary storage to the StoreOnce appliance. But it isn't used between two appliances.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 4
- Liked: never
- Joined: Aug 16, 2016 3:43 pm
- Full Name: Brent Dowling
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Any update yet on when catalyst copy support will be supported? We keep hearing it is coming soon, but that has been since 9.0. We did see Catalyst support but it was short the catalyst copy functionality.
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Hi Brent, please see the latest (month old) update from Anton above:
Gostev wrote: ↑Oct 26, 2018 5:30 pm Yes Nick, it is still planned. While this feature was indeed requested two years ago, considering that only a small portion of Veeam customers will benefit from one I could not possibly prioritize it above existing commitments and high priority features important for the majority of our users. Additionally, this particular feature has to be taken care of by the specific R&D subteam, which has been quite overloaded in the past couple of years.
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 13
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: Apr 15, 2015 9:38 am
- Full Name: Tom Cogghe
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
So, has this feature - finally - been included in U4 ?
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Hi Tom, Catalyst Copy is not in U4. However, U4 includes a number of other enhancements for StoreOnce support, please refer to the What's New document for more details. Thanks!
-
- Novice
- Posts: 3
- Liked: never
- Joined: Oct 24, 2016 10:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Disappointing.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 34
- Liked: 3 times
- Joined: Dec 11, 2017 12:35 pm
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
I concur with mc20piece, this is rather disappointing.
I hoped that with this closer collaboration with HPE to push Veeam, this feature would get more priority to be implemented.
Also due to fact that StoreOnce Appliances are much more affordable than they used to be and they do a pretty damn good job when it comes to deduplication.
I do see over 350TB user data stored on 25TB diskspace !
The one thing that is killing the back-up is copying data from one StoreOnce to the other with Veeam.
I hoped that with this closer collaboration with HPE to push Veeam, this feature would get more priority to be implemented.
Also due to fact that StoreOnce Appliances are much more affordable than they used to be and they do a pretty damn good job when it comes to deduplication.
I do see over 350TB user data stored on 25TB diskspace !
The one thing that is killing the back-up is copying data from one StoreOnce to the other with Veeam.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 58
- Liked: 18 times
- Joined: Oct 14, 2016 3:54 pm
- Full Name: Ian Button
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
I absolutely agree - Catalyst is great, Veeam is great - together they could be brilliant! Hurry up Veeam developers . . . !
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 31
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: Jan 10, 2018 9:27 am
- Full Name: rdrost
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Dissapointing indeed. We are also waiting for this feature.
And also the ability to migrate backup jobs from one Storeonce to another including the backup chain which is not possible now. Maybe this comes along with "catalyst copy" support.
It's good to know the feature is still planned but i guess it will not come "soon".
(And bytheway the new Storeonce Cloud Bank feature is also not supported by Veeam. )
And also the ability to migrate backup jobs from one Storeonce to another including the backup chain which is not possible now. Maybe this comes along with "catalyst copy" support.
It's good to know the feature is still planned but i guess it will not come "soon".
(And bytheway the new Storeonce Cloud Bank feature is also not supported by Veeam. )
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 11
- Liked: 4 times
- Joined: Jul 15, 2016 8:40 pm
- Full Name: Dave Reichert
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Personally, I'd rather see the ability to copy or move files/chains between Catalyst based repositories using the "Files" tab before native Catalyst Copy support. I'd like to move certain jobs/backup files to stores where they will dedupe better to each other rather than in gigantic stores, like I naively originally set up. Also, it would likely result in better parallel restore/backup job performance. Unfortunately the "Files" tab doesn't let you do this for Catalyst stores like it does with regular repositories.
I have over a PB worth of restore point data on my remote unit. One thing is for certain though, I'm not looking forward to the day when the 5100's go end-of-support, and someone asks how we can migrate the data from these units to new hardware. It will take FOREVER, if even be possible at all. And don't even tell me that Cloud is the answer. Who's got money for the storage, and the amount of bandwidth it will take to get there.
Not sure why some of you are having issues with merge operations that cause them to take any longer than SF creations, but on my end they run in about the same time. I have two 5100's with two expansion trays each, at my primary DC connected via 2x10GbE, and my remote site connected by a single 1GbE, and my copy jobs take a bit longer than I'd like, but certainly before the next day's run.
Storage Snapshot integration and a physical backup proxy tied into the SAN is a godsend.
I have over a PB worth of restore point data on my remote unit. One thing is for certain though, I'm not looking forward to the day when the 5100's go end-of-support, and someone asks how we can migrate the data from these units to new hardware. It will take FOREVER, if even be possible at all. And don't even tell me that Cloud is the answer. Who's got money for the storage, and the amount of bandwidth it will take to get there.
Not sure why some of you are having issues with merge operations that cause them to take any longer than SF creations, but on my end they run in about the same time. I have two 5100's with two expansion trays each, at my primary DC connected via 2x10GbE, and my remote site connected by a single 1GbE, and my copy jobs take a bit longer than I'd like, but certainly before the next day's run.
Storage Snapshot integration and a physical backup proxy tied into the SAN is a godsend.
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Hi Dave, thanks for the feedback. This is also on our list.Personally, I'd rather see the ability to copy or move files/chains between Catalyst based repositories using the "Files" tab before native Catalyst Copy support.
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 11
- Liked: 4 times
- Joined: Jul 15, 2016 8:40 pm
- Full Name: Dave Reichert
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Thanks.
Oh, and one more thing - Allow offload of files from Catalyst Stores to Tape via the "Files to Tape" jobs.
-Dave
Oh, and one more thing - Allow offload of files from Catalyst Stores to Tape via the "Files to Tape" jobs.
-Dave
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
This one is also there.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 31
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: Jan 10, 2018 9:27 am
- Full Name: rdrost
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Recently ia picked up a rumour that Veeam wil support Catalyst Copy / move files/chains between Catalyst based repositories using the "Files" tab in V10. True ??
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Well, the rumour is partially true. v10 will indeed support Catalyst Copy for replication of backups between repositories, but not via the Files tab.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 31
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: Jan 10, 2018 9:27 am
- Full Name: rdrost
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
OK, thanks for the update:
So V10 will support HPE Storeonce Catalyst Copy Replication of backups between repositorys. Does this eliminate the need for having two backup copy jobs for archival purposes ?
Moving a backup chain for the purpose of allowing the backub job to run on another HPE storeonce repository is still not possible in V10. Correct ?
So V10 will support HPE Storeonce Catalyst Copy Replication of backups between repositorys. Does this eliminate the need for having two backup copy jobs for archival purposes ?
Moving a backup chain for the purpose of allowing the backub job to run on another HPE storeonce repository is still not possible in V10. Correct ?
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Depending on what was the scenario for having two backup copy jobs. The main scenario for Catalyst Copy will be mirroring the primary repository between StoreOnce devices. You can then use backup copy jobs to offload backups further with GFS retention, to comply with the 3-2-1 rule, or mirror them to a third StoreOnce instead.
Migration to another StoreOnce repository will also be possible.
Migration to another StoreOnce repository will also be possible.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 31
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: Jan 10, 2018 9:27 am
- Full Name: rdrost
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
We have primary backup jobs wit 14 day/restorepoints.
We have one copy job with onsite Storeonce repository as target en one copy job wite remote offsite storeonce repository as target. Both copy jobs keep 14 daily, 5 weekly, 12 Monthly GFS restore points.
So i was thinking using only one copy job and let it replicate through Catalyst Copy.
OR
Using only primary backup jobs but then it's not easy to keep 14 daily, 5 weekly, 12 Monthly GFS restore points.
Wil migration to another StoreOnce repository possibility also move the existing backup chain ? This can not be done in 9.5 update 4 with Storeonce repository (makes use of Files tab).
We have one copy job with onsite Storeonce repository as target en one copy job wite remote offsite storeonce repository as target. Both copy jobs keep 14 daily, 5 weekly, 12 Monthly GFS restore points.
So i was thinking using only one copy job and let it replicate through Catalyst Copy.
OR
Using only primary backup jobs but then it's not easy to keep 14 daily, 5 weekly, 12 Monthly GFS restore points.
Wil migration to another StoreOnce repository possibility also move the existing backup chain ? This can not be done in 9.5 update 4 with Storeonce repository (makes use of Files tab).
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Yes, in this case, you will be able to switch from two backup copy jobs to a single Catalyst Copy one.So i was thinking using only one copy job and let it replicate through Catalyst Copy.
Yes, Catalyst Copy job will allow migrating the entire chain.Wil migration to another StoreOnce repository possibility also move the existing backup chain ? This can not be done in 9.5 update 4 with Storeonce repository (makes use of Files tab).
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 31
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: Jan 10, 2018 9:27 am
- Full Name: rdrost
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
That's great !
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 58
- Liked: 18 times
- Joined: Oct 14, 2016 3:54 pm
- Full Name: Ian Button
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
This all looks like good news! Can't wait for V10 to appear Any progress with support for CloudBank?
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: No Catalyst Copy support?
Hi Ian, nothing to share at this point.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 53 guests